Cited by 52Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Sorption behaviour of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) as affected by the properties of coastal estuarine sediments

Oliver, Danielle P., Navarro, Divina A., Baldock, Jeff, Simpson, Stuart L., Kookana, Rai S.·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

The sorption of three perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), namely perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), was determined in 19 coastal sediments. There are currently limited data on the sorption behaviour of these chemicals in marine or estuarine sediments and the properties controlling their sorption have not been well established. The median average PFOS K d value (30.4 L/kg) was >8 times that for PFOA (3.3 L/kg) and PFHxS (2.8 L/kg). Highly significant (P < .001) linear relationships were found between values for sorption coefficients (K d) for all three chemicals (PFOS, PFOA and PFHxS) to the estuarine sediments and organic carbon (OC) content with r 2 values ranging from 0.87 to 0.91. The nature of the constituents of OC was determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) for a subset (10) of the sediments to assess whether the strong relationship between sorption and OC was due solely to an increasing amount of OC or to particular OC fractions. The NMR analysis could not provide strong evidence for one OC fraction type explaining the variation in sorption of the three PFASs. Further investigation using partial least squares of the whole spectra also did not show any particular OC components could explain the K d variation. This data suggests that variation in sorption in these sediments was primarily due to the varying OC content and not its chemistry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137263

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliver, D. P., Navarro, D. A., Baldock, J., Simpson, S. L., & Kookana, R. S.
Affiliations
  • CSIRO Land and Water (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Oliver, Danielle P.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
720
Pages
137263
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008179831
Cited by
52
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NSW Environmental Trust
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS sorption, estuarine sediments, coastal sediments, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorohexane sulfonic acid, organic carbon content, sorption coefficient, marine sediment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review