Cited by 165Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Investigation of levels of perfluoroalkyl substances in surface water, sediment and fish tissue in New Jersey, USA

Goodrow, Sandra M., Ruppel, Bruce, Lippincott, Robert L., Post, Gloria B., Procopio, Nicholas A.·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances found in New Jersey (NJ) due to historic and current industrial activities and the use of aqueous film forming foams. This research documents PFAS occurrence in surface water, sediments, and fish tissue at 11 targeted waterbodies in NJ suspected to be impacted by PFAS. Thirteen PFAS compounds were quantified from each media. The profile of detected PFAS differed among media from the same site, with shorter chain PFAS tending to predominate in surface water while longer chain PFAS predominated in fish and sediments. All water samples contained detectable levels of at least four perfluoroalkyl substances. PFOA, PFHpA and PFPeA were detected at every site. ΣPFAS concentrations in water samples ranged from 22.9 to 279.5 ng/L. At least one, and up to eight, PFAS were detected in sediment samples at 10 sites, while there were no detections of PFAS in sediments at the reference site. ΣPFAS concentrations in sediment samples ranged from below detection to 30.9 ng/g. At least one fish of each species at every site had detectable levels of PFAS compounds. ΣPFAS concentrations in fish were highest at sites downstream from a military facility, and lowest at the reference site. PFOS, PFDA, PFUnA and PFDoA were the predominant PFAS detected in fish tissue. PFOS was generally found in fish tissue at higher concentrations than other PFAS, with higher PFOS concentrations found in the tissue of yellow perch, American eel, pumpkinseed, and largemouth bass collected at sites with higher detections of PFOS in surface waters. PFOS levels in nearly all fish species were, on average, high enough to trigger fish consumption advisories. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate the sources and occurrence of PFAS in NJ and to better understand their movement through the environment and potential risks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138839

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stormwater runoff PFAS levels in this study were much higher than those in prior studies.

    “Compared to prior studies, stormwater runoff PFAS levels in this study were much higher.”
  • Long chain PFAS have a higher affinity for adsorption to particulate matter and are observed more in soil, sediment, and plant roots, while short chain PFAS are highly soluble in water and are observed more in aqueous compartments and plant shoots.

    “Long chain PFAS have a higher affinity for adsorption to particulate matter, thus they are observed more in soil, sediment, and plant roots while short chain PFAS are highly soluble in water and are observed more in aqueous compartments and plant shoots (Bai and Son, 2021; Dalahmeh et al., 2018; Goodrow et al., 2020; Sardiña et al., 2019).”
  • Hydrophilic short-chain PFAS (C ≤ 8) are typically found in surface waters, whereas hydrophobic long-chain PFAS (C > 8) tend to bioaccumulate in fish tissues and sediments.

    “Their chain length and functional moieties determine their environmental occurrence and distribution with hydrophilic short-chain PFAS (C ≤ 8) typically found in surface waters, whereas the hydrophobic long-chain PFAS (C > 8) tend to bioaccumulate in fish tissues and sediments (Goodrow et al., 2020; Bai and Son, 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodrow, S. M., Ruppel, B., Lippincott, R. L., Post, G. B., & Procopio, N. A.
Affiliations
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (US)
Corresponding author
Procopio, Nicholas A.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
729
Pages
138839
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021561529
Cited by
165
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 4
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • State of New Jersey Department of State
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS contamination, surface water, sediment, fish tissue, PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFHpA, PFPeA, perfluorodecanoic acid, perfluorododecanoic acid, fish consumption advisories, yellow perch, Anguilla rostrata, Lepomis gibbosus, largemouth bass, New Jersey
MeSH terms
Animals, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, New Jersey, Perches, Water, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review