Cited by 24Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluoride Effects and Removal

Estimation of per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances mass loads in the Danube River using passive sampling

Open access
Beggs, Carly, Mackie, Rachel, Vrana, Branislav, Prokeš, Roman, Gorji, Sara Ghorbani, Schulze, Bastian, Thomas, Kevin V., Mueller, Jochen F. +1 more·2023·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

As Europe's second longest river, the Danube is an important water source for drinking water and irrigation for many countries, before discharging into the Black Sea in the East. Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been observed over the last two decades in concentrations exceeding the European Union's drinking water guidelines for total sum of 20 select PFAS of 0.1 μg L−1. Their presence is a result of current and historical use and high environmental persistence, necessitating their monitoring for human risk assessments. The aim of this study is to use recently developed passive sampling technology to calculate time-integrated water concentrations and mass loads of 11 select PFAS at 9 sites along the Danube River. Results indicate ∑11 PFAS concentrations in the range of 9.3–29.6 ng L−1 were not in exceedance of EU drinking water guidelines, but perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) was in exceedance of the environmental quality standard (0.65 ng L−1) at all sampling locations. The highest ∑11 PFAS mass loads were observed at Ruse (9.5 kg day−1) and Budapest (6.3 kg day−1), believed to be driven by proximity to industrial facilities and large populations (urban runoff). Finally, we estimate 4.9 kg of total PFAS (∑11 PFAS) were delivered to the Black Sea daily over Summer 2019.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164458

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PFAS have been widely reported in European surface water, sediment, and biota.

    “Across Europe, PFAS have been widely reported in surface water, sediment, and biota [6,7,8,9].”

    From Integrated Targeted and Suspect Screening Workflow for Identifying PFAS of Concern in Urban-Impacted Serbian Rivers (2026) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Introduction says PFAS contamination across Europe has been widely reported and describes findings in river water and biota. It mentions removal to sediment as a possible environmental process, but does not report PFAS findings in sediment. The cited paper therefore supports the surface-water and biota portions, not the sediment portion. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies on PFAS contamination in the Danube report average PFOS concentrations of 7 ng/L (2010), 5.9 ng/L (2017), and approximately 2.1 ng/L (2023).

    “Previous studies on PFAS contamination in the Danube report average PFOS concentrations of 7 ng/L (2010) [73], 5.9 ng/L (2017) [74], and approximately 2.1 ng/L (2023) [7], while our study detects an average level of 1.8 ng/L.”

    From Investigating the extent of PFAS contamination in the Upper Danube Basin across environmental compartments (2025) · cites this paper as [7]

    Section 3.1 reports PFOS concentrations of 0.7–4.4 ng/L at nine Danube sites, supporting the general concentration range attributed to the 2023 paper. The passages available from our copy do not report an overall average of approximately 2.1 ng/L; the visible 2.1 ng/L value is a total for three PFAS at Galati, not its PFOS concentration. The paper also says sampling took place in summer 2019, although it was published in 2023. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Upper Danube Basin has been the focus of micropollutant monitoring, providing opportunities to integrate external data sets into a harmonized assessment of contamination profiles.

    “This region has been the focus of micropollutant monitoring [7,73,74], providing opportunities to integrate external data sets into a harmonized assessment of contamination profiles.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Vrana, B., et al., 2021. Analysis of organic substances in the Danube River surface water by passive sampling. In: Liška, Igor, et al. (Eds.), Joint Danube Survey 4: A Shared Analysis of the Danube River. International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River, Vienna, pp. 349-362.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beggs, C., Mackie, R., Vrana, B., Prokeš, R., Gorji, S. G., Schulze, B., Thomas, K. V., Mueller, J. F., & Kaserzon, S. L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Masaryk University (CZ)
Corresponding author
Beggs, Carly
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-09
Volume
892
Pages
164458
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4378627999
Cited by
24
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Veřejné služby Informačního systému (Masarykiana Brunensis Universitas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020
  • Czech Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fluoride Effects and Removal
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, Danube River, passive sampling, PFOS, drinking water guidelines, environmental quality standards, urban runoff, industrial pollution, Black Sea, river pollution
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Seasons, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Rivers, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review