Cited by 51Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactUrban Stormwater Management Solutions

Spatio-temporal assessment of perfluorinated compounds in the Brisbane River system, Australia: Impact of a major flood event

Gallen, Christie, Baduel, Christine, Lai, Foon Yin, Thompson, Kristie, Thompson, Jack, Warne, Michael, Mueller, Jochen F.·2014·Marine Pollution Bulletin

Abstract

Perfluorinated chemicals including PFOA and PFOS have been widely used in consumer products and have become ubiquitous pollutants widely distributed in the aqueous environment. Following a major flood event in 2011, water samples were collected along a spatial gradient of the Brisbane River system to provide an initial estimate of the release of PFASs from flooded urban areas. PFOA (mean concentrations 0.13-6.1 ng L(-1)) and PFOS (mean concentrations 0.18-15 ng L(-1)) were the most frequently detected and abundant PFASs. Mean total PFASs concentrations increased from 0.83 ng L(-1) at the upstream Wivenhoe Dam to 40 ng L(-1) at Oxley Creek, representing an urban catchment. Total masses of PFOA and PFOS delivered into Moreton Bay from January to March were estimated to be 5.6 kg and 12 kg respectively. From this study, urban floodwaters appear to be a previously overlooked source of PFASs into the surrounding environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.02.014

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gallen, C., Baduel, C., Lai, F. Y., Thompson, K., Thompson, J., Warne, M., & Mueller, J. F.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Gallen, Christie
Venue
Marine Pollution Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
597-605
ISSN
0025-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001480153
Cited by
51
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Marine Pollution Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Queensland Health
  • University of Queensland
  • Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFOS, PFAS contamination, floodwater, urban runoff, Brisbane River, Moreton Bay, spatiotemporal variation
MeSH terms
Australia, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Urbanization, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Supply, Rivers, Floods, Spatio-Temporal Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review