Cited by 45Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Quantifying Diffuse and Point Inputs of Perfluoroalkyl Acids in a Nonindustrial River Catchment

Müller, Claudia E., Spiess, Nora, Gerecke, Andreas C., Scheringer, Martin, Hungerbühler, Konrad·2011·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

Recently, the role of diffuse inputs of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) into surface waters has been investigated. It has been observed that river loads increased during rain and that street runoff contained considerable loads of PFAAs. This study aims at quantifying these diffuse inputs and identifying the initial sources in a small nonindustrial river catchment. The river was sampled in three distinct subcatchments (rural, urban, and wastewater treatment plant) at high temporal resolution during two rain events and samples were analyzed for perfluorocarboxylates and perfluorosulfonates. Additionally, rain, stormwater runoff, wastewater effluent, and drinking water were sampled. PFAA concentrations in river water were all low (e.g., < 10 ng/L for perfluorooctanoate, PFOA), but increased during rainfall. PFAA concentrations and water discharge data were integrated into a mass balance assessment that shows that 30-60% of PFAA loads can be attributed to diffuse inputs. Rain contributed 10-50% of the overall loads, mobilization of dry deposition and outdoor release of PFAA from products with 20-60%. We estimated that within a year 2.5-5 g of PFOA originating from rain and surface runoff are emitted into this small catchment (6 km(2), 12,500 persons).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/es202140e

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Müller, C. E., Spiess, N., Gerecke, A. C., Scheringer, M., & Hungerbühler, K.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Empa (CH)
Corresponding author
Gerecke, Andreas C.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2011-10-28
Volume
45
Issue
23
Pages
9901-9909
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W2313052264
Cited by
45
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesamt für Umwelt
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
perfluoroalkyl acids, non-point source pollution, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorocarboxylates, stormwater runoff, mass balance, dry deposition, wastewater treatment plant effluent, drinking water contamination
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Models, Theoretical, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review