Cited by 20Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Detection of ventilatory thresholds using near-infrared spectroscopy with a polynomial regression model

Open access
Lin, Chih-Wei, Huang, Chun-Feng, Wang, Jong-Shyan, Fu, Li-Lan, Mao, Tso-Yen·2020·Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences

Abstract

Whether near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a convenient and accurate method of determining first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2) using raw data remains unknown. This study investigated the reliability and validity of VT1 and VT2 determined by NIRS skeletal muscle hemodynamic raw data via a polynomial regression model. A total of 100 male students were recruited and performed maximal cycling exercises while their cardiopulmonary and NIRS muscle hemodynamic data were measured. The criterion validity of VT1VET and VT2VET were determined using a traditional V-slope and ventilatory efficiency. Statistical significance was set at α = . 05. There was high reproducibility of VT1NIRS and VT2NIRS determined by a NIRS polynomial regression model during exercise (VT1NIRS, r = 0.94; VT2NIRS, r = 0.93). There were high correlations of VT1VET vs VT1NIRS (r = 0.93, p < .05) and VT2VET vs VT2NIRS (r = 0.94, p < .05). The oxygen consumption (VO2) between VT1VET and VT1NIRS or VT2VET and VT2NIRS was not significantly different. NIRS raw data are reliable and valid for determining VT1 and VT2 in healthy males using a polynomial regression model. Skeletal muscle raw oxygenation and deoxygenation status reflects more realistic causes and timing of VT1 and VT2.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.03.005

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ICC values for MOT1 vs VT1/LT1 in cycling are in line with other studies using non-portable NIRS in cycling.

    “These results are in line with other studies that determined thresholds with non-portable NIRS in cycling50.”

    From Reliability of threshold determination using portable muscle oxygenation monitors during exercise testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2023) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Discussion and Conclusions report NIRS-derived ventilatory thresholds during cycling, and the paper finds a strong association between its NIRS and ventilatory VT1 measures. However, it reports Pearson correlations rather than ICC values, and the Methods identify the NIRS system without stating whether it was non-portable. The cited paper therefore supports the general comparison, but not those specific details. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) has been proposed as a surrogate for ventilatory thresholds (VT1, VT2) or lactate thresholds (LT1, LT2) in various endurance sports.

    “Muscle oxygen saturation (SmO2) has been proposed as a surrogate for ventilatory thresholds (VT1, VT2) (Lin et al., 2020; Reinpõld et al., 2024; Rodrigo‐Carranza et al., 2021) or lactate thresholds (LT1, LT2) (Farzam et al., 2018; Feldmann et al., 2022; Fleitas‐Paniagua et al., 2024; Raleigh et al., 2018; Salas‐Montoro et al., 2022) in various endurance sports, including cycling, running and rowi”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, C.-W., Huang, C.-F., Wang, J.-S., Fu, L.-L., & Mao, T.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Chaoyang University of Technology (TW)
  • National Yang Ming University Hospital (TW)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • National Taiwan Sport University (TW)
Corresponding author
Mao, Tso-Yen
Venue
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1637-1642
ISSN
1319-562X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011232768
Cited by
20
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Chang Gung University (EMRPD1A0841)
  • Chang Gung Medical Foundation (MRPD2C0161, CMRPD1A0132)
  • Healthy Aging Research Center
  • National Science Council (NSC 100-2314-B-182-004-MY3)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
ventilatory threshold, near-infrared spectroscopy, polynomial regression, skeletal muscle oxygenation, muscle deoxygenation, ventilatory efficiency, criterion validity, reproducibility, cycling exercise, oxygen consumption, exercise physiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review