Cited by 4,404Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 1 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

National Sleep Foundation's sleep time duration recommendations: methodology and results summary.

Open access

Abstract

Consensus recommendations on sufficient sleep duration across the lifespan using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleh.2014.12.010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 1 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

    • Probably not a substantial claim. 58
    • It may state two separate claims as one. 5
    59 of 59
    • The paper relies on this without support.

      Actual sleep time is typically less than time in bed.

      “actual sleep time is typically less than time in bed”
    • The paper relies on this without support.

      Sleep is a vital part of physical, cognitive, and emotional health.

      “Sleep, like diet and exercise, is a vital part of physical, cognitive, and emotional health.”
    • The paper relies on this without support.

      The literature, especially cohort and population studies, often do not distinguish between time in bed and actual sleep time.

      “The literature, especially cohort and population studies, often do not distinguish between time in bed and actual sleep time.”
    • The paper relies on this without support.

      Intervention studies using laboratory measured sleep time typically produce shorter sleep durations.

      “intervention studies using laboratory measured sleep time will typically produce shorter sleep durations”
    4 of 4

    Claims other papers make about this one

    Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

    Self-check

    Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

    • Three of 18 panelists is less than 20%

      Minor

      Three of 18 panelists is 16.7%, not more than 20%. At least four panelists would have to vote outside the specified range to meet the stated threshold.

      Reported 20 · recomputed 16.666667

    1 of 1

    Citations

    Cites

    Flagged first, then by citations

    Show all 3 references

    Cited by

    Sorted by citations

    Items 601–700 of 4,366

    Metadata

    Authors
    Hirshkowitz, M., Whiton, K., Albert, S. M., Alessi, C., Bruni, O., DonCarlos, L., Hazen, N., Herman, J., Katz, E. S., Kheirandish-Gozal, L., Neubauer, D. N., O’Donnell, A. E., Ohayon, M., Peever, J., Rawding, R., Sachdeva, R. C., Setters, B., Vitiello, M. V., Ware, J. C., & Adams Hillard, P. J.
    Affiliations
    • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
    • National Sleep Foundation (US)
    • University of Pittsburgh (US)
    • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
    • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
    • Loyola University Chicago (US)
    • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
    • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
    • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
    • Johns Hopkins University (US)
    • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
    • Stanford Medicine (US)
    • University of Toronto (CA)
    • Gannon University (US)
    • American Academy of Pediatrics (US)
    • University of Louisville (US)
    • University of Washington (US)
    • Eastern Virginia Medical School (US)
    Corresponding author
    Whiton, Kaitlyn
    Venue
    Sleep Health
    Publisher
    Elsevier BV
    Published
    2015-03
    Volume
    1
    Issue
    1
    Pages
    40-43
    ISSN
    2352-7218 (ISSN-L)
    OpenAlex
    W2088948024
    Cited by
    4,404
    References
    3
    Citations by year
    2026: 396 · 2025: 539 · 2024: 506 · 2023: 502 · 2022: 539 · 2021: 497 · 2020: 392 · 2019: 352 · 2018: 283 · 2017: 184 · 2016: 160 · 2015: 47
    FWCI
    338.65
    Type
    journal article
    Language
    en
    Open access
    Locations
    • Sleep Health (publishedVersion)
    • PubMed (publishedVersion)
    • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
    Funders
    American Thoracic Society
    Topics
    • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
    • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
    • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
    Keywords
    RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, sleep disorders

    About these checks

    Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

    A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

    A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

    Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

    Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

    What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

    Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review