Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 628

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of actigraphy for assessment in pediatric sleep research

Open access
Meltzer, Lisa J., Montgomery-Downs, Hawley E., Insana, Salvatore P., Walsh, Colleen M.·2012·Sleep Medicine Reviews
DOI 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.10.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The use of actigraphs, or ambulatory devices that estimate sleep-wake patterns from activity levels, has become common in pediatric research. Actigraphy provides a more objective measure than parent-report, and has gained popularity due to its ability to measure sleep-wake patterns for extended periods of time in the child’s natural environment. The purpose of this review is: (1) to provide comprehensive information on the historic and current uses of actigraphy in pediatric sleep research; (2) to review how actigraphy has been validated among pediatric populations; and (3) offer recommendations for methodological areas that should be included in all studies that utilize actigraphy, including the definition and scoring of variables commonly reported. The poor specificity to detect wake after sleep onset was consistently noted across devices and age groups, thus raising concerns about what is an “acceptable” level of specificity for actigraphy. Other notable findings from this review include the lack of standard scoring rules or variable definitions. Suggestions for the use and reporting of actigraphy in pediatric research are provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.10.002

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 628

Metadata

Authors
Meltzer, L. J., Montgomery-Downs, H. E., Insana, S. P., & Walsh, C. M.
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
463-475
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.smrv.2011.10.002
OpenAlex
W2041722543
Cited by
628
References
21
FWCI
30.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.