Cited by 17Sleep and related disordersHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Effects of cognitive behavioural therapy on insomnia in adults with tinnitus: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open access
Curtis, Ffion, Laparidou, Despina, Bridle, Chris, Law, Graham R., Durrant, Simon, Rodriguez, Alina, Pierzycki, Robert H., Siriwardena, Aloysius N.·2021·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

Insomnia is common in patients with tinnitus and negatively affects tinnitus symptoms and quality of life. This systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) based interventions on insomnia in adults with tinnitus. We conducted a comprehensive database search (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and PROSPERO) for published, unpublished and ongoing randomised controlled trials of CBT in adults with tinnitus. Five trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review, with four of these providing data for the meta-analysis. This demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in Insomnia Severity Index (a standard diagnostic questionnaire of insomnia used in clinical settings) following CBT (-3.28, 95% CI -4.51, -2.05, P=<0.001). There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%). Risk of bias was considered low in all categories except blinding of participants, personnel, and/or the assessment of outcomes. Here, for the first time, we demonstrate that CBT-based interventions can significantly improve sleep in adults with tinnitus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101405

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curtis, F., Laparidou, D., Bridle, C., Law, G. R., Durrant, S., Rodriguez, A., Pierzycki, R. H., & Siriwardena, A. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Lincoln (GB)
  • University of Bedfordshire (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Curtis, Ffion
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
56
Pages
101405
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109957924
Cited by
17
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Repository (University of Gloucestershire) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • University of Nottingham
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, tinnitus, insomnia, sleep quality, Insomnia Severity Index, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Quality of Life, Tinnitus, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review