Cited by 16Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging and Gerontology ResearchHealth disparities and outcomes

Network recall among older adults with cognitive impairments

Open access
Roth, Adam R., Peng, Siyun, Coleman, Max E., Finley, Evan, Perry, Brea L.·2021·Social Networks

Abstract

Although it is widely accepted that personal networks influence health and illness, network recall remains a major concern. This concern is heightened when studying a population that is vulnerable to cognitive decline. Given these issues, we use data from the Social Network in Alzheimer Disease project to explore similarities and discrepancies between the network perceptions of focal participants and study partners. By leveraging data on a sample of older adults with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and early stage dementia, we explore how cognitive impairment influences older adults' perceptions of their personal networks. We find that the average individual is more likely to omit weaker, peripheral ties from their self-reported networks than stronger, central ties. Despite observing only moderate levels of focal-partner corroboration across our sample, we find minimal evidence of perceptual differences across diagnostic groups. We offer two broad conclusions. First, self-reported network data, though imperfect, offer a reasonable account of the core people in one's life. Second, our findings assuage concerns that cognitively impaired older adults have skewed perceptions of their personal networks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socnet.2020.08.005

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bernard H. Russell, Killworth Peter, and Sailer Lee. 1981 “ Summary of Research on Informant Accuracy in Network Data and the Reverse Small World Problem.” Connections 4(2): 11– 25.
  2. Freeman Linton, Romney Kimball, and Freeman Sue. 1987 “ Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy - Freeman - 1987 - American Anthropologist - Wiley Online Library.” American Anthropologist.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roth, A. R., Peng, S., Coleman, M. E., Finley, E., & Perry, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Roth, Adam R.
Venue
Social Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
64
Pages
99-108
ISSN
0378-8733 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3084205111
Cited by
16
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Networks (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute
  • National Institute on Aging
  • Indiana University Bloomington
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
older adults, cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, early-stage dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review