Cited by 585Nonprofit Sector and VolunteeringAging and Gerontology ResearchTourism, Volunteerism, and Development

Volunteering and Mortality Among Older Adults: Findings From a National Sample

Musick, M. A., Herzog, A. R., House, J. S.·1999·The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although a number of authors have proposed that older volunteers should benefit in terms of better health and well-being, few researchers have examined the issue empirically to see whether this is true. The purpose of this article is to build on this literature by empirically examining the association between volunteering and mortality among older adults. METHODS: Using data from a nationally representative sample, we use Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the effects of volunteering on the rate of mortality among persons aged 65 and older. RESULTS: We find that volunteering has a protective effect on mortality among those who volunteered for one organization or for forty hours or less over the past year. We further find that the protective effects of volunteering are strongest for respondents who report low levels of informal social interaction and who do not live alone. DISCUSSION: We discuss the possibility that the curvilinear relationship we observe between volunteering and mortality is due to a combination of factors, including self-identity, role strain, and meaningfulness. Other research using more precise data is needed to determine whether these ideas are supportable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geronb/54b.3.s173

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The remaining studies found statistically significant but contradictory associations between at least one measure of volunteering and mortality.

    “The remainder found statistically significant associations between at least one measure of volunteering status or intensity (e.g. frequency, hours spent, number of organisations supported) and mortality [26,38,47,50]. Interpretation was difficult, however, as studies reported statistically significant, but contradictory associations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Musick, M. A., Herzog, A. R., & House, J. S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Published
1999-05-01
Volume
54B
Issue
3
Pages
S173-S180
ISSN
  • 1079-5014 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5368
OpenAlex
W2104257773
Cited by
585
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 26
FWCI
40.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag009978-02)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG005561, R01AG09978-01, P01 AG05561)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development
Keywords
volunteering, mortality, older adults, informal social interaction, living alone, role strain, self-identity, meaningfulness, curvilinear relationship
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Mortality, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review