Cited by 12Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcarePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsEmpathy and Medical Education

Better outcomes through patient - Provider therapeutic connections? An exploratory study of proposed mediating variables

Rathert, Cheryl, Mittler, Jessica N., Vogus, Timothy J., Lee, Yuna S.H.·2023·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Background Patient-provider therapeutic connections (TCs) have been theorized to enhance patient outcomes as well as care provider job satisfaction and to reduce burnout. High-quality TCs may result in better matching of health care to patient needs, and thus, better care quality and patient outcomes. For care providers, work environments that enable high-quality TCs may make the work more motivating and facilitate resilience.Method We surveyed patients (n = 346) and care providers (n = 341) about their experiences of TCs, and how TCs related to outcomes. We tested parallel mediation models to examine relations.Results TCs predicted better patient health status, mental health status, and satisfaction, and predicted greater care provider job satisfaction and lower burnout. TCs were theorized to operate through two sets of mechanisms (health self-efficacy and activation for patients; meaningfulness of work and psychological safety for providers). Results revealed significant indirect associations between TCs and outcomes for both groups.Conclusions TCs are associated with patient and provider outcomes; however, these relations appear to be explained by several mediating variables. It appears that TCs are associated with better outcomes for patients through health self-efficacy and activation, and TCs are associated with better outcomes for care providers through meaningfulness of work and psychological safety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116290

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rathert, C., Mittler, J. N., Vogus, T. J., & Lee, Y. S. H.
Affiliations
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Rathert, Cheryl
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
338
Pages
116290
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387652155
Cited by
12
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Teachers College
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
Keywords
patient outcomes, job satisfaction, burnout, health self-efficacy, activation, meaningful work, psychological safety, patient satisfaction, mental health
MeSH terms
Mediation Analysis, Health Facilities, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Patients, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review