The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous research also has shown that a strong friendship tends to inflate over-scoring in peer assessment (Panadero et al., 2013).”
From Does anonymity matter? Examining quality of online peer assessment and students' attitudes (2020) · cites this paper as Panadero et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“Peer assessment has also been shown to be more accurate when rubrics are utilised.”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as Panadero, Romero, & Strijbos (2013)
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312450709336664 · Cited by 4,225
Messick, S. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741 · Cited by 4,198
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 1,509
Barron, B. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1203_1 · Cited by 1,446
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–195 of 195
Exploring the Impact of Innovative Assessment Methods on Learning Outcomes
Devaki, V. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3645-8.ch015 · Cited by 7
Wang, Q., & Fang, Q. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106389 · Cited by 8
How Personality Traits Affect Peer Assessment in Distance Learning
Alves, T., Sousa, F., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2023) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-023-09694-2 · Cited by 9
Peer Assessment within Hybrid and Online Courses: Students’ View of Its Potential and Performance
Sullivan, D., & Watson, S. (2015) · Journal of Educational Issues · doi:10.5296/jei.v1i1.7255 · Cited by 7
A First Step Towards Synthesizing Rubrics and Video for the Formative Assessment of Complex Skills
Ackermans, K., Rusman, E., Brand‐Gruwel, S., & Specht, M. M. (2017) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57744-9_1 · Cited by 7
Respondent disengagement from a peer assessment instrument measuring Collaboration Viability
Heslop, B., Stojanovski, E., Iveson, S. M., Paúl, J., & Bailey, K. A. (2017) · Australasian journal of engineering education · doi:10.1080/22054952.2018.1437676 · Cited by 8
Argumentation-based learning with digital concept mapping and college students’ epistemic beliefs
Alt, D., & Kapshuk, Y. (2021) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-021-09385-8 · Cited by 7
van Blankenstein, F. V., Truțescu, G.-O., van der Rijst, R. M., & Saab, N. (2019) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-019-09482-5
Are We Collaborating Yet? Employee Assessment of Peer’s Perceptions
Heslop, B., Stojanovski, E., Paúl, J., & Bailey, K. A. (2017) · International Journal of Human Resource Studies · doi:10.5296/ijhrs.v7i4.11818 · Cited by 6
Nixon, J. (2021) · English Teaching Practice & Critique · doi:10.1108/etpc-07-2020-0070 · Cited by 6
Patients as Feedback Providers: Exploring Medical Students’ Credibility Judgments
Eijkelboom, C., de Kleijn, R. A. M., van Diemen, W. J. M., Maljaars, C. D. N., van der Schaaf, M. F., & Frenkel, J. (2023) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.5334/pme.842 · Cited by 10
Teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards students’ self assessment: A latent profile analysis
Baidoo-Anu, D., Asamoah, D., & Adusei, A. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100275 · Cited by 11
Improving Peer Assessment Validity and Reliability Through a Fuzzy Coherence Measure
Alaoui, M. E. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2023.3321660 · Cited by 6
Baker, B. A., Homayounzadeh, M., & Arias, A. (2020) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100771 · Cited by 6
Rater Errors among Peer-Assessors: Applying the Many-Facet Rasch Measurement Model
Esfandiari, R. (2015) · Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.18869/acadpub.ijal.18.2.77 · Cited by 6
Developing a system to increase motivation and engagement in student code peer review
Ada, M. B., & Majid, M. U. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale54877.2022.00023 · Cited by 5
Elementary EFL Students' Practice of Peer Assessment of Oral Classroom Activities
Hung, Y.-J., Chen, S.-C., & Samuelson, B. L. (2016) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.245 · Cited by 5
Educating Students in Technology Enhanced Learning Design by Interweaving Instruction and Assessment
Γόγουλου, Α., & Grigoriadou, M. (2021) · Informatics in Education · doi:10.15388/infedu.2021.17 · Cited by 6
Gender bias in team-building activities in China
Lou, Y., Liu, X., Chen, P., Zhang, K., & Sun, L. (2021) · Gender in Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/gm-04-2020-0116 · Cited by 6
Aben, J. E. J., Lara, M. M., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09660-0 · Cited by 4
Self-citationPrompiengchai, S., Baby, N. K., & Joordens, S. (2024) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101058 · Cited by 6
Aben, J. E. J., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101248 · Cited by 6
Self-citationSeroussi, D., Peled, Y., Sharon, R., Rothschild, N., Barlev, O. H., Weissblueth, E., & Harpaz, G. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13070654 · Cited by 4
Ocampo, J. C. G., Panadero, E., Sánchez‐Iglesias, I., & Díez, F. (2025) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101455 · Cited by 4
Self-citationReliability of peer assessment of patient education simulations
Ficzere, C., Clauson, A. S., & Lee, P. H. (2019) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2019.02.021 · Cited by 4
Examining Rater Biases of Peer Assessors in Different Assessment Environments
Yeşilçınar, S., & Şata, M. (2021) · International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies · doi:10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.4.622 · Cited by 4
Using cross-course peer grading with content expertise, anonymity, and perceived justice
Schee, B. A. V., Stovall, T., & Andrews, D. (2022) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/14697874221096751 · Cited by 4
Pérez-Torregrosa, A.-B., Romero-López, M.-A., Ibáñez-Cubillas, P., & Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J. (2017) · Revista Practicum · doi:10.24310/revpracticumrep.v2i1.8265 · Cited by 4
Rubrics and Exemplars in Writing Assessment
de Leeuw, J. (2015) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23347-5_4 · Cited by 4
Peer review in early academic writing: impact vs. students’ beliefs
Boillos, M. M. (2024) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2024.2311836 · Cited by 3
Pérez‐Higueras, J. J., Arroquia, J. J. H., & Gancedo‐Caravia, L. (2025) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/jdd.13831 · Cited by 3
Rasooli, A., Pitt, E., Turner, J., Varga‐Atkins, T., Moindrot, W., Preston, S., & Asgari, S. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2502587 · Cited by 3
Peer Assessment Reliability in an Organic Chemistry Activity: Do Students Overrate Their Peers?
Atarés, L., & Molina, J. A. L. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00945 · Cited by 5
Studying how social relationships affect peer assessment in an E-learning environment
Sousa, F., Alves, T., Gama, S. P., Jorge, J. A., & Gonçalves, D. J. V. (2024) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-024-09505-0 · Cited by 3
Saldarriaga, M. A. R., Apolo, J. D. C. S., Lata, M. V. B., Maldonado, N. E. C., & Zambrano, K. M. S. (2025) · Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar · doi:10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i2.17259 · Cited by 3
TEAMMATES in virtual exchange: tool and tips for peer assessment
Dooly, M. (2022) · doi:10.14705/rpnet.2022.59.1413 · Cited by 3
Designing Effective Assessment Strategies for Online Courses in Higher Education
Efthymiou, I.-P. (2023) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-8646-7.ch014 · Cited by 3
Lehane, S., & O’Mahony, T. (2024) · European Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/21568235.2024.2402361 · Cited by 3
Yan, Z., Lao, H., Panadero, E., & Fernández-Castilla, B. (2026) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2026.2681630 · Cited by 5
Self-citationGiving Feedback to Peers in an Online Inquiry-Learning Environment
Dmoshinskaia, N., & Gijlers, H. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_13 · Cited by 3
Mitigating Generosity Bias in Peer Assessment: a Tool for Oral Class Presentations
Dery, L., & Lange, M. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt61570.2024.00086 · Cited by 2
Peer editing and writing proficiency: an experimental study in South Korean higher education
Campbell, C. W., & Brandon, M. W. (2024) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2024.2399701 · Cited by 2
Zhao, Y. E., Zhang, F., & Schunn, C. D. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2512416 · Cited by 2
Friendship bias in peer assessment of EFL oral presentations
Tanaka, M. (2025) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2025.2570248 · Cited by 3
Online Peer Assessment in a First Cycle University Degree – Which Challenges?
Relvas, M. D. J. C., Pinto, M. D. C. T., Oliveira, I., & Pereira, A. (2020) · EDEN Conference Proceedings · doi:10.38069/edenconf-2020-rw-0016 · Cited by 2
Teoretický model pro formativní hodnocení při badatelsky orientované výuce matematiky a přírodopisu
Samková, L., Rokos, L., Petr, J., & Stuchlíková, I. (2021) · Pedagogika · doi:10.14712/23362189.2020.1836 · Cited by 2
Analyzing Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Peer Assessment in EFL Teaching
Rahmatillah, R., & Fajrita, R. (2022) · Indonesian Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.58835/ijtte.v2i2.124 · Cited by 2
Son, M., & Ha, M. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241256538 · Cited by 2
Interactive and Iterative Peer Assessment
Dery, L. (2024) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia240656 · Cited by 2
Using Rubrics to Enhance Accuracy of Peer Assessment and Self-Judgment in Biology Learning
Fadillah, S. M., & Ha, M. (2024) · Asia-Pacific Science Education · doi:10.1163/23641177-bja10080 · Cited by 1
Gerges, E., & Rice, B. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2536565 · Cited by 2
A Coding Framework for Analyzing the Types and Levels of Peer Feedback
Lee, S., & Ha, M. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261418083 · Cited by 1
Student and Instructor Ratings in Geographic Information Systems: A Comparative Analysis
Ortega, E., Martín, B., & Avila, S. G. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14010098 · Cited by 1
Keller, M. V., Daumiller, M. H., & Dresel, M. (2025) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2025.2555322 · Cited by 1
The Impact of Rubric-Guided Peer Review and Self-Assessment in an Engineering Math University Course
Pericleous, S., Tsolaki, E., Charalambides, M., & Panaoura, A. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15111433 · Cited by 1
Gorjipour, H., & Hoseinpoor, M. (2018) · International Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.5430/ijelt.v6n1p20 · Cited by 1
Abdullah, A., & Ak, A. (2020) · IIUM Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.31436/ijes.v7i1.234 · Cited by 1
Mikrovyučování jako prostor pro implementaci vrstevnického hodnocení do přípravy studentů učitelství
Rokos, L. (2020) · Pedagogická orientace · doi:10.5817/pedor2020-3-315 · Cited by 1
Effect of Peer Feedback on Self-assessment in Writing
Peloghitis, J. (2019) · Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) · doi:10.34577/00004616 · Cited by 1
The Global Conference on Education and Research: Volume 3
James, W. B., & Çobanoğlu, C. (2019) · Conference proceedings · doi:10.5038/2572-6374-v3
STUDENT PERECPTIONS AND REFLECTIONS IN PEER REVIEW OF GROUP PROJECTS
Thomson, G. A., Spooner, D. P., & Chalashkanov, N. M. (2015)
EXPLORING NEW FRONTIERS IN SELF AND PEER ASSESSMENT
de Leeuw, J., Szumlas, B., Jordan, K., Humphry, S., & Matsumoto, L. (2014) · doi:10.11575/prism/5282
A Peer Assessment-Based Mobile Learning Approach of Science Course: A Case Study
Bai, Q., Zhang, Y., Beilei, C., Fulan, F., Pinghong, Z., & Li, L. (2016) · International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT) · doi:10.1109/eitt.2016.16
Larsson, T. (2017) · Studia Neophilologica · doi:10.1080/00393274.2017.1354719
Conversations and Perspectives on Peer Feedback for Problem Solving
Urch, G., & Carpenter, Y. (2018) · Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) · doi:10.11575/pplt.v3i1.53146
EVALUATION OF A MOBILE PEER-EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR IN-CLASS PRESENTATIONS
Göbel, P., & Kano, M. (2019) · Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age · doi:10.33965/celda2019_201911c051
الرفاعی, ا. م. ص. م. (2020) · مجلة کلية التربية بدمياط · doi:10.21608/jsdu.2020.132140
Dmoshinskaia, N. (2020) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036551175
The Assessment Cycle: A Simple Model to Capture Student Growth
Hushman, G., Hushman, C. J., & Lucero, A. (2021) · Strategies · doi:10.1080/08924562.2021.1948473
Peer Assessments in Engineering: A Pilot Project
Thurnhofer‐Hemsi, K., Molina‐Cabello, M. A., Palomo, E. J., López‐Rubio, E., & Domínguez, E. (2021) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87872-6_27
Using Digital Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool in a Culturally Diverse Learning Environment
Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71644-8_5
Kapshuk, Y., & Alt, D. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882370 · Cited by 1
SAFA: A System for Assisting Fair Assessments in Team Collaboration
Lou, Y., Guo, K., Liu, X., Chen, P., Yang, C., & Sun, L. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06038-0_17
Comparing Expert and Peer Assessment of Pedagogical Design in Integrated STEAM Education
Vakkou, K., Hovardas, T., Xenofontos, N. A., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_6 · Cited by 2
Learning How to Become a Teacher Researcher
O’Brien, E., Brady, J., CEALLAIGH, T. Ó., Babbitt, K., Brosnan, A., Byrne, E., Byrne, E. N., Curtin, R., Gaffney, L., & O'Callaghan, K. (2023) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6086-3.ch004 · Cited by 1
Eijkelboom, C. (2023) · doi:10.33540/1853
Factors Influencing Unfair Behavior in Peer Assessment: Evidence from a Situational Experiment
Liu, H., & Feng, Y. (2024) · International Conference on New Media Development and Modernized Education (NMDME) · doi:10.4108/eai.13-10-2023.2341083
Video clubs in physics teaching assistant training: Teaching assistants’ experiences
Lehtinen, A., Lehesvuori, S., Maunuksela, J., Hämäläinen, R., & Koskinen, P. (2024) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.20.020101
Teamwork assessment in undergraduate Engineering coursesPreprint
Pang, T. Y., Kootsookos, A., Fox, K. E., & Pirogova, E. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-4984098/v1
Ploeger, N. A., & Strong, J. (2024) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/23294906241278917
Reddiger, M., & Scherfner, M. (2024) · Teaching Mathematics and its Applications An International Journal of the IMA · doi:10.1093/teamat/hrae026
Riegler, R., & Guest, J. (2025) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2025.2465687
Käpylä, J., & Palvalin, M. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2566659 · Cited by 3
Cognitive-Aware Peer Assessment: Design Implications from a Classroom Deployment
Bouskila, N., & Dery, L. (2025) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2025f8584
Gunning, T. K., Conlan, X. A., Collins, P. K., Bellgrove, A., Antlej, K., Cardilini, A. P. A., & Fraser, C. L. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.20296371
Teacher's and students' experiences and appreciation of feedback in the L1-oral language classroom
Wurth, A., Tigelaar, D. E. H., Hulshof, H., de Jong, J. C., & Admiraal, W. (2025) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102217
Revilla‐Cuesta, V., Hernando-Revenga, M., Martín, I., Skaf, M., & Ortega‐López, V. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16020306
Jesus, M. M. D., Hobbs, K. S., Adams, P. E., Ammamoo, E., Costello, R. A., Cotner, S. H., Creech, C., Driessen, E. P., Hammarlund, S. P., Foster‐Hartnett, D., et al. (2026) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.25-07-0154
Assessment Aggregation under Conflict of InterestPreprint
Fujiwara‐Greve, T., Kawada, Y., Nakamura, Y., & Okamoto, N. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6544140
Evaluating the effectiveness of ChatGPT in rubric development
Dünya, B. A., Gülle, T., & Demir, M. C. (2026) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2026.101067 · Cited by 1
Using individual vs. group evaluation to incentivize effort for heterogeneous groups
Jongjaroenkamol, P. (2026) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics · doi:10.1080/16081625.2026.2695633
Wiertz, C., Coppe, T., Pire, M., Galand, B., & Colognesi, S. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103178
Metadata
- Authors
- Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J.-W.
- Affiliations
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Panadero, Ernesto
- Venue
- Studies in Educational Evaluation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 195-203
- ISSN
- 0191-491X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989213880
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 38.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer assessment, assessment rubrics, construct validity, concept maps, peer feedback, perceived fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review