Cited by 195Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational Technology and AssessmentInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort

Open access

Panadero, Ernesto, Romero, Margarida, Strijbos, Jan-Willem·2013·Studies in Educational Evaluation

DOI 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Using multivariate statistics
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312450709336664 · Cited by 4,225
Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning.
Messick, S. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741 · Cited by 4,198
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 1,509
When Smart Groups Fail
Barron, B. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1203_1 · Cited by 1,446
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206
Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks
Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543070003287 · Cited by 1,170
Peer Learning and Assessment
Boud, D. J., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293990240405 · Cited by 1,134
Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis
Nesbit, J. C., & Adesope, O. O. (2006) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543076003413 · Cited by 932
The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 · Cited by 839
Self-citation
Current Concerns in Validity Theory
Kane, M. T. (2001) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.2001.tb01130.x · Cited by 753
Handbook of Formative Assessment
Andrade, H. (2010) · doi:10.4324/9780203874851 · Cited by 663
Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups.
Jehn, K. A., & Shah, P. P. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.4.775 · Cited by 581
Promoting Learning and Achievement Through Self-Assessment
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405840802577544 · Cited by 558
Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004 · Cited by 536
The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning
Sadler, P., & Good, E. (2006) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1 · Cited by 535
Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views
Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360123776 · Cited by 516
Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education
Falchikov, N. (2005) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 449
Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility
Topping, K. J. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4 · Cited by 374
Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives.
Cho, K., Schunn, C. D., & Wilson, R. W. (2006) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.891 · Cited by 355
“But is it fair?”: An exploratory study of student perceptions of the consequential validity of assessment
Sambell, K., McDowell, L., & Brown, S. A. (1997) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/s0191-491x(97)86215-3 · Cited by 339
Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process
Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K., & Mylonas, A. (2002) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293022000009302 · Cited by 329
Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning
Jones, A. C., & Issroff, K. (2004) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004 · Cited by 309
On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course
Tseng, S.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007 · Cited by 293
Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: an empirical study of student peer‐group rating
Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268 · Cited by 258
Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education
Panadero, E., Tapia, J. A., & Martínez, J. A. H. (2012) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007 · Cited by 244
Self-citation
Social effects of collaborative learning in primary schools
Tolmie, A. K., Topping, K. J., Christie, D., Donaldson, C., Howe, C. J., Jessiman, E., Livingston, K., & Thurston, A. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.005 · Cited by 237
Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments
Strijbos, J.-W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002 · Cited by 223
Self-citation
Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise
Cheng, W., & Warren, M. (1997) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079712331381064 · Cited by 220
Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features
van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002 · Cited by 218
“Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry
Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.10004 · Cited by 211
Scoring Concept Maps: An Integrated Rubric for Assessing Engineering Education
Besterfield‐Sacre, M., Gerchak, J., Lyons, M. R., Shuman, L. J., & Wolfe, H. E. (2004) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00795.x · Cited by 206
Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation
Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008 · Cited by 193
Students as the Definitive Source of Formative Assessment: Academic Self-Assessment and the Self-Regulation of Learning
(2010) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · doi:10.4324/9780203874851-12 · Cited by 190
Windows into the mind
Shavelson, R. J., Ruiz‐Primo, M. A., & Wiley, E. W. (2005) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-004-9448-9 · Cited by 187
Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Peer Assessment: A Case for Student and Staff Development
Smith, H., Cooper, A., & Lancaster, L. (2002) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/13558000110102904 · Cited by 178
Peer Assessment in Problem-Based Learning: A Qualitative Study
Papinczak, T., Young, L., & Groves, M. (2006) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6 · Cited by 164
The Development and Maintenance of Friendship
Hays, R. B. (1984) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407584011005 · Cited by 163
Involving Students in Assessment
Falchikov, N. (2004) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.2304/plat.2003.3.2.102 · Cited by 157
Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system
Brown, G., Glasswell, K., & Harland, D. (2004) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.07.001 · Cited by 155
The impact of stress in self‐ and peer assessment
Pope, N. K. (2004) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0260293042003243896 · Cited by 132
Self-, peer- and teacher-assessment of student essays
Lindblom‐Ylänne, S., Pihlajamäki, H., & Kotkas, T. (2006) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787406061148 · Cited by 122
Learning how to use a computer-based concept-mapping tool: Self-explaining examples helps
Hilbert, T. S., & Renkl, A. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.006 · Cited by 119
Reciprocity as a Source of Bias in Multiple Peer Assessment of Group Work
Magin, D. (2001) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070020030715 · Cited by 115
Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts effect on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy in pre-service teachers
Panadero, E., Alonso‐Tapia, J., & Urbano, E. R. (2013) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.001 · Cited by 113
Self-citation
The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: the role of scientific epistemological views
Tsai, C.-C., & Liang, J.-C. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9047-0 · Cited by 105
Creativity and Music Education: The Impact of Social Variables
MacDonald, R., & Miell, D. (2000) · International Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1177/025576140003600107 · Cited by 102
An Assessment of Reliability and Validity of a Rubric for Grading APA-Style Introductions
Stellmack, M. A., Konheim‐Kalkstein, Y. L., Manor, J. E., Massey, A. R., & Schmitz, J. (2009) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00986280902739776 · Cited by 95
An Examination of the Use of Peer Rating for Formative Assessment in the Context of the Theory of Consumption Values
Pope, N. K. (2001) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930120052396 · Cited by 88
Keeping and Ending Casual, Close and Best Friendships
Rose, S. M., & Serafica, F. C. (1986) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407586033002 · Cited by 87
Concept Maps as an Assessment Tool in Psychology Courses
Jacobs‐Lawson, J. M., & Hershey, D. A. (2002) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15328023top2901_06 · Cited by 78
Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance / Rúbricas y guiones de autoevaluación: efectos sobre la autorregulación y el rendimiento de estudiantes universitarios de primer año
Panadero, E., Alonso‐Tapia, J., & Martínez, J. A. H. (2014) · Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2014.881655 · Cited by 69
Self-citation
Improving Learning through Interventions of Student-Generated Questions and Concept Maps
Berry, J. W., & Chew, S. L. (2008) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00986280802373841 · Cited by 54
Friendship and collaborative creative writing in the primary classroom
Vass, É. (2002) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00216.x · Cited by 49
Fostering Interactivity through Formative Peer Assessment in (Web-Based) Collaborative Learning Environments
Strijbos, J.-W., Ochoa, T. A., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009) · Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Web-Based Education · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-392-0.ch018 · Cited by 48
Self-citation
Using student feedback to construct an assessment rubric for a concept map in physiology
Moni, R. W., Beswick, E., & Moni, K. (2005) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00066.2004 · Cited by 42
Learning to assess students using peer review
Pond, K., & ul‐Haq, R. (1997) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/s0191-491x(97)86214-1 · Cited by 42
Anonymity in classroom voting and debating
Ainsworth, S., Gelmini-Hornsby, G., Threapleton, K., Crook, C., O’Malley, C., & Buda, M. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.001 · Cited by 38
Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Web-based Education: Integrating Human Factors and Personalization
Mourlas, C., Tsianos, N., & Germanakos, P. (2009) · Cited by 33
Student perceptions and use of an assessment rubric for a group concept map in physiology
Moni, R. W., & Moni, K. (2008) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00030.2007 · Cited by 24
Optimising new modes of assessment: in search of qualities and standards
Schuwirth, L. (2004) · Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs · doi:10.1007/bf03056663 · Cited by 21
ASSESSING THE ASSESSORS: ADDED VALUE IN WEB-BASED MULTI-CYCLE PEER ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Kali, Y., & Ronen, M. (2008) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1142/s1793206808000434 · Cited by 17
An Evaluation of Teacher Trainees' Opinions of the Peer Assessment in Terms of Some Variables
Karaca, E. (2009) · Cited by 7
Students’ Peer Evaluation Calibration Through The Administration Of Vignettes
Wang, J., & Imbrie, P. K. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--16755 · Cited by 4

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Sorted by citations

The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 · Cited by 446
The future of student self-assessment: a review of known unknowns and potential directions.
Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2 · Cited by 388
Self-citation
To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy
Panadero, E., & Roméro, M. (2014) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2013.877872 · Cited by 263
Self-citation
An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading
Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186 · Cited by 232
Self-citation
Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings
Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Kornhaber, M. L., Lyu, Y., Chung, K. S., & Suen, H. K. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.999746 · Cited by 215

See all 195

Authors: Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J.-W.
Affiliations: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author: Panadero, Ernesto
ORCID: Panadero, Ernesto
Strijbos, Jan-Willem
Venue: Studies in Educational Evaluation
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2013-12
Volume: 39
Issue: 4
Pages: 195-203
ISSN: 0191-491X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005
OpenAlex: W1989213880
Cited by: 195
References: 70
Citations by year: 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
FWCI: 38.72
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
figshare.com
Licence: cc-by
Locations: Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics: Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords: peer assessment, assessment rubrics, construct validity, concept maps, peer feedback, perceived fairness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks