Cited by 195Student Assessment and FeedbackEducational Technology and AssessmentInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort

Open access

Panadero, Ernesto, Romero, Margarida, Strijbos, Jan-Willem·2013·Studies in Educational Evaluation

DOI 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Using multivariate statistics
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
The Content Analysis Guidebook
Neuendorf, K. A. (2017) · doi:10.4135/9781071802878 · Cited by 9,286
Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312450709336664 · Cited by 4,225
Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning.
Messick, S. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741 · Cited by 4,198
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 1,509
When Smart Groups Fail
Barron, B. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1203_1 · Cited by 1,446

Show all 70 references

Sorted by citations

The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 · Cited by 446
The future of student self-assessment: a review of known unknowns and potential directions.
Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2 · Cited by 388
Self-citation
To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy
Panadero, E., & Roméro, M. (2014) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2013.877872 · Cited by 263
Self-citation
An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading
Panadero, E., & Alqassab, M. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186 · Cited by 232
Self-citation
Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings
Li, H., Xiong, Y., Zang, X., Kornhaber, M. L., Lyu, Y., Chung, K. S., & Suen, H. K. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.999746 · Cited by 215
Promoting Argumentation Competence: Extending from First- to Second-Order Scaffolding Through Adaptive Fading
Noroozi, O., Kirschner, P. A., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9400-z · Cited by 183
Peer feedback or peer feedforward? Enhancing students’ argumentative peer learning processes and outcomes
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13054 · Cited by 163
Effects of Rubrics on Academic Performance, Self-Regulated Learning, and self-Efficacy: a Meta-analytic Review
Panadero, E., Jönsson, A., Pinedo, L., & Fernández‐Castilla, B. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09823-4 · Cited by 247
Self-citation
Anonymity as an instructional scaffold in peer assessment: its effects on peer feedback quality and evolution in students’ perceptions about peer assessment skills
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8 · Cited by 126
Self-citation
Effects of self-assessment and peer-assessment interventions on academic performance: A meta-analysis
Yan, Z., Lao, H., Panadero, E., Fernández‐Castilla, B., Yang, L., & Yang, M. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100484 · Cited by 182
Self-citation
Anonymous versus identified peer assessment via a Facebook-based learning application: Effects on quality of peer feedback, perceived learning, perceived fairness, and attitude toward the system
Lin, G.-Y. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.010 · Cited by 111
Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation
Laveault, D., Allal, L., & Publishing, S. I. (2016) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0 · Cited by 105
Teachers’ reasons for using peer assessment: positive experience predicts use
Panadero, E., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0282-5 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
What if pupils can assess their peers anonymously? A quasi-experimental study
Vanderhoven, E., Raes, A., Montrieux, H., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.001 · Cited by 96
Training peer-feedback skills on geometric construction tasks: role of domain knowledge and peer-feedback levels
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0 · Cited by 92
Self-citation
Re-conceptualizing classroom assessment fairness: A systematic meta-ethnography of assessment literature and beyond
Rasooli, A., Zandi, H., & DeLuca, C. (2018) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.12.008 · Cited by 90
The Reliability and Validity of Peer Review of Writing in High School AP English Classes.
Schunn, C. D., Godley, A., & Martino, S. D. (2016) · Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy · doi:10.1002/jaal.525 · Cited by 87
How Accurate Are Our Students? A Meta-analytic Systematic Review on Self-assessment Scoring Accuracy
León, S. P., Panadero, E., & García‐Martínez, I. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09819-0 · Cited by 106
Self-citation
A systematic review on peer assessment: intrapersonal and interpersonal factors
Panadero, E., Alqassab, M., Fernández Ruiz, J., & Ocampo, J. C. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2164884 · Cited by 80
Self-citation
Structuring the peer assessment process: a multilevel approach for the impact on product improvement and peer feedback quality
Gielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12096 · Cited by 78
Structural validity and invariance of the Feedback Perceptions Questionnaire
Strijbos, J.-W., Pat‐El, R., & Narciss, S. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100980 · Cited by 87
Self-citation
Problem-based learning, self- and peer assessment in higher education: towards advancing lifelong learning skills
Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2020) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2020.1849371 · Cited by 111
¿Cómo emplear las rúbricas para implementar una verdadera evaluación formativa?
Fraile, J., Pardo, R., & Panadero, E. (2017) · Revista Complutense de Educación · doi:10.5209/rced.51915 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Analysis of New Zealand primary and secondary student peer- and self-assessment comments: applying Hattie and Timperley’s feedback model
Harris, L. R., Brown, G., & Harnett, J. A. (2014) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2014.976541 · Cited by 68
A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer assessment
Adachi, C., Tai, J., & Dawson, P. (2017) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1405913 · Cited by 74
The anonymous reviewer: the relationship between perceived expertise and the perceptions of peer feedback in higher education
Dijks, M. A., Brummer, L., & Kostons, D. D. N. M. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1447645 · Cited by 72
A plan for the co-construction and collaborative use of rubrics for student learning
Kilgour, P. W., Northcote, M. T., Williams, A. P., & Kilgour, A. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1614523 · Cited by 62
Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: a look inside the black box
Stančić, M. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1828267 · Cited by 89
The development of secondary students' feedback literacy: peer assessment as an intervention
Ketonen, L., Nieminen, P., & Hähkiöniemi, M. (2020) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2020.1835794 · Cited by 57
“Incomprehension in this area may result in unproductive practices, such as the provision of superficial positive feedback (Tasker & Herrenkohl, 2016) or friendship marking (Foley, 2013; Panadero et al., 2013), which occurs when students let social relationships affect the feedback they provide.”
Background
Students’ perceptions of peer assessment effectiveness: an explorative study
Sridharan, B., Muttakin, M. B., & Mihret, D. G. (2018) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2018.1476894 · Cited by 58
Use of WhatsApp in Higher Education
Güler, Ç. (2016) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633116667359 · Cited by 53
Health management students’ self-regulation and digital concept mapping in online learning environments
Alt, D., & Naamati-Schneider, L. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02542-w · Cited by 62
Automatic detection of inconsistencies between numerical scores and textual feedback in peer-assessment processes with machine learning
Rico-Juan, J. R., Gallego, A., & Calvo-Zaragoza, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103609 · Cited by 50
How do students perceive the educational value of peer assessment in relation to its social nature? A survey study in Flanders
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Estrada, E., & Schellens, T. (2017) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.003 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Charting the routes to revision: An interplay of writing goals, peer comments, and self-reflections from peer reviews
Zhang, F., Schunn, C. D., & Baikadi, A. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9420-6
Knowing me, knowing you: the effects of peer familiarity on receiving peer feedback for undergraduate student writers
van Heerden, M., & Bharuthram, S. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1863910 · Cited by 42
A comparative study of Chinese and United States pre-service teachers’ perceptions about ethical issues in classroom assessment
Liu, J., Johnson, R. L., & Fan, X. (2016) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.01.002 · Cited by 41
Changes in the reliability and validity of peer assessment across the college years
Zhang, F., Schunn, C. D., Li, W.-T., & Long, M. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1724260 · Cited by 39
“Now you know what you’re doing right and wrong!” Peer feedback quality in synchronous peer assessment in secondary education
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Schellens, T., & Raes, A. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0329-x · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Enhanced Peer Assessment in MOOC Evaluation Through Assignment and Review Analysis
Alcarria, R., Bordel, B., de Andrés, D. M., & Robles, T. (2018) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i01.7461 · Cited by 36
Using Peer Review for Student Performance Enhancement: Experiences in a Multidisciplinary Higher Education Setting
Serrano-Aguilera, J. J., Tocino, A., Fortes, S., Martín, C., Melé, P. M., Moreno-Sáez, R., Muñoz, A., Palomo-Hierro, S., & Torres, A. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11020071 · Cited by 36
The Effect of Peer Assessment on Non-Cognitive Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
Li, H., Bialo, J. A., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., & Guo, X. (2021) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957347.2021.1933980 · Cited by 42
Providing Formative Peer Feedback
Panadero, E., Jönsson, A., & Alqassab, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.020 · Cited by 41
Self-citation
El uso de e-rúbricas para la evaluación de competencias en estudiantes universitarios : estudio sobre fiabilidad del instrumento
Berrocoso, J. V., & Gómez, A. C. (2014) · REDU Revista de Docencia Universitaria · doi:10.4995/redu.2014.6415 · Cited by 43
Relationships between Peer- and Self-Assessment and Teacher Assessment of Young EFL Learners’ Oral Presentations
Hung, Y.-J., Samuelson, B. L., & Chen, S.-C. (2015) · Educational linguistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0_13 · Cited by 34
Promoting students' creative self-efficacy, critical thinking and learning performance: An online interactive peer assessment approach guided by constructivist theory in maker activities
Wang, X.-M., Huang, X.-T., Han, Y.-H., & Hu, Q.-N. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101548 · Cited by 53
Fairness in Classroom Assessment: A Systematic Review
Baniasadi, A., صالحی, ک., Khodaie, E., Noaparast, K. B., & Izanloo, B. (2022) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00636-z · Cited by 57
Promoting learning by leveraging the collaborative nature of formative peer assessment with instructional scaffolds
Strijbos, J.-W., & Wichmann, A. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0353-x · Cited by 31
Self-citation
Uso de rúbricas en educación superior y evaluación de competencias
Martínez, L. C. V., & Hurtado, J. C. T. (2018) · Profesorado Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.30827/profesorado.v22i3.7998 · Cited by 31
Peer assessment as a method for facilitating cross-sector learning: A national pilot
Clymer, F., & Gibson, D. (2022) · Pharmacy Education · doi:10.46542/pe.2022.221.595608 · Cited by 32
Sharing the construction of assessment rubrics with students: A Model for collaborative rubric construction
Morton, J. K., Northcote, M. T., Kilgour, P. W., & Jackson, W. (2021) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.18.4.9 · Cited by 33
Does anonymity matter? Examining quality of online peer assessment and students' attitudes
Kobayashi, M. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.4694 · Cited by 29
“Students with a higher level of friendship with the assessors still tended to over-score significantly more than those with a lower level friendship (Panadero et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluential
A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among online self-, peer-, external- and instructor-assessments: The competitive effect
Domínguez, C., Jaime, A., Sánchez, A., Blanco, J. M., & Heras, J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.061 · Cited by 28
The different impact of a structured peer-assessment task in relation to university undergraduates’ initial writing skills
Ramon-Casas, M., Nuño, N., Pons, F., & Cunillera, T. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1525337 · Cited by 27
Tracing the path toward self-regulated revision: An interplay of instructor feedback, peer feedback, and revision goals
Li, W., & Zhang, F. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612088 · Cited by 26
Optimal feedback structure and interactional pattern in formative peer practices: Students' beliefs
Ghahari, S., & Sedaghat, M. (2018) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.02.003 · Cited by 26
A mixed methods approach to the assessor's targeting behavior during online peer assessment: effects of anonymity and underlying reasons
Yu, F., & Sung, S. (2015) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1041405 · Cited by 26
Giving Feedback on Peers’ Concept Maps in an Inquiry Learning Context: The Effect of Providing Assessment Criteria
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2020) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-020-09884-y · Cited by 28
The factor structure of the peer-feedback orientation scale (PFOS): toward a measure for assessing students’ peer-feedback dispositions
Kasch, J., van Rosmalen, P., Henderikx, M., & Kalz, M. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1893650 · Cited by 27
Measuring Fairness and Justice in the Classroom: A Systematic Review of Instruments’ Validity Evidence
Rasooli, A., Zandi, H., & DeLuca, C. (2022) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/2372966x.2021.2000843 · Cited by 28
Students’ experiences of peer feedback practices as related to awareness raising of learning goals, self-monitoring, self-efficacy, anxiety, and enjoyment in teaching EFL and mathematics
Vattøy, K.-D., & Gamlem, S. M. (2024) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2023.2192772 · Cited by 23
Using and rejecting peer feedback in the science classroom: a study of students’ negotiations on how to use peer feedback when designing experiments
Anker-Hansen, J., & Andrée, M. (2019) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2018.1557628 · Cited by 23
The role of goal orientations and learning approaches in explaining digital concept mapping utilization in problem-based learning
Alt, D., Weinberger, A., Heinrichs, K., & Naamati-Schneider, L. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02613-7 · Cited by 35
Does an assessment rubric provide a better learning experience for undergraduates in developing transferable skills?
Pang, T. Y., Kootsookos, A., Fox, K. E., & Pirogova, E. (2022) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.19.3.03 · Cited by 20
Triangulation of language assessment modes: learning benefits and socio-cognitive prospects
Ghahari, S., & Farokhnia, F. (2017) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2017.1342540 · Cited by 18
Are men and women really different? The effects of gender and training on peer scoring and perceptions of peer assessment
Ocampo, J. C. G., Panadero, E., & Díez, F. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2130167 · Cited by 20
Self-citation
Computer supported novice group critique
Easterday, M. W., Lewis, D. R., Fitzpatrick, C., & Gerber, E. M. (2014) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/2598510.2600889 · Cited by 19
Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis
Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3 · Cited by 18
Implementing Cognitive Science and Discipline-Based Education Research in the Undergraduate Science Classroom
Davidesco, I., & Milne, C. E. (2019) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-12-0240 · Cited by 18
Factors That Determine the Perceived Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Collaborative Learning: a Mixed Methods Design
Daou, D., Sabra, R., & Zgheib, N. K. (2020) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-020-00980-7 · Cited by 20
Influence of personality and modality on peer assessment evaluation perceptions using Machine Learning techniques
Cachero, C., Rico-Juan, J. R., & Macià, H. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119150 · Cited by 23
The Power of Peer Learning
Noroozi, O., & Wever, B. D. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2 · Cited by 23
Hybrid and Online Peer Group Grading: Adding Assessment Efficiency While Maintaining Perceived Fairness
Schee, B. A. V., & Birrittella, T. D. (2021) · Marketing Education Review · doi:10.1080/10528008.2021.1887746 · Cited by 18
Who engaged in the team-based assessment? Leveraging EdTech for a self and intra-team peer-assessment solution to free-riding
Gunning, T. K., Conlan, X. A., Collins, P. K., Bellgrove, A., Antlej, K., Cardilini, A. P. A., & Fraser, C. L. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-022-00340-y · Cited by 25
Video‐enhanced or textual rubrics: Does the Viewbrics' formative assessment methodology support the mastery of complex (21st century) skills?
Ackermans, K., Rusman, E., Nadolski, R. J., Specht, M. M., & Brand‐Gruwel, S. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12525 · Cited by 17
Self-regulation of peer feedback quality aspects through different dimensions of experience within prior peer feedback assignments
Zhang, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102210 · Cited by 19
FOPA-MC: fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making for peer assessment
Capuano, N., Caballé, S., Percannella, G., & Ritrovato, P. (2020) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-020-05155-5 · Cited by 15
Peer vs. Self-Grading of Practice Exams: Which Is Better?
Jackson, M. A., Tran, A., Wenderoth, M. P., & Doherty, J. H. (2018) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.18-04-0052 · Cited by 14
Influence of individual versus collaborative peer assessment on score accuracy and learning outcomes in higher education: an empirical study
Rico-Juan, J. R., Cachero, C., & Macià, H. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1955090 · Cited by 16
Peer assessment use, its social nature challenges and perceived educational value: A teachers’ survey study
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.001 · Cited by 14
Self-citation
Feedback and year level effects on university students’ self-efficacy and emotions during self-assessment: positive impact of rubrics vs. instructor feedback
Panadero, E., García-Pérez, D., Ruiz, J. F., Fraile, J., Sánchez‐Iglesias, I., & Brown, G. (2023) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2023.2254015 · Cited by 23
Self-citation
An investigation of the reliability and validity of peer, self-, and teacher assessment
Salehi, M., & Masoule, Z. S. (2017) · Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies · doi:10.2989/16073614.2016.1267577 · Cited by 14
Exploring the reliability and its influencing factors of peer assessment in massive open online courses
Li, H., Zhao, C., Long, T., Huang, Y. C., & Shu, F. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13143 · Cited by 13
Effects of rubric quality on marker variation in higher education
Chakraborty, S., Dann, C. E., Mandal, A., Dann, B., Paul, M., & Hafeez‐Baig, A. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100997 · Cited by 12
What predicts variation in reliability and validity of online peer assessment? A large‐scale cross‐context study
Xiong, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Wu, Y. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12861 · Cited by 13
Students’ perceptions of fairness in groupwork assessment: validity evidence for peer assessment fairness instrument
Rasooli, A., Turner, J., Varga‐Atkins, T., Pitt, E., Asgari, S., & Moindrot, W. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2354510 · Cited by 12
Understanding Rater Bias in Self and Peer Assessment among University Students: A Cultural Psychology Perspective
Tandiono, R., & Limijaya, A. (2025) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-024-00967-7 · Cited by 11
The Four Pillars of Peer Assessment for Collaborative Teamwork in Higher Education
Sridharan, B., McKay, J., & Boud, D. J. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_1 · Cited by 15
Online argumentation-based learning aided by digital concept mapping during COVID-19: implications for health management teaching and learning
Alt, D., & Naamati-Schneider, L. (2021) · Health Education · doi:10.1108/he-12-2020-0125 · Cited by 11
Bias in student evaluations: Are my peers out to get me?
McMillan, A. G., Solanelles, P., & Rogers, B. L. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101032 · Cited by 11
Online peer-assessment quality control: A proactive measure, validation study, and sensitivity analysis
Yu, F., Liu, Y.-H., & Liu, K. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101279 · Cited by 10
Do Teamwork Guidelines Improve Peer Assessment Accuracy or Attitudes During Collaborative Learning?
Lu, M., & Chiu, M. M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2021.3130242 · Cited by 9
Análisis de validez en la evaluación entre iguales: un estudio en educación superior
Pascual-Gómez, I., Lorenzo-Llamas, E. M., & Monge-López, C. (2015) · RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.7203/relieve.21.1.5168 · Cited by 8
Exploring an effective automated grading model with reliability detection for large‐scale online peer assessment
Lin, Z., Yan, H., & Zhao, L. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12970 · Cited by 12
The impact of peer assessment design on interpersonal processes: A systematic review
Senden, M., & Coertjens, L. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101405 · Cited by 12
Portal and Gatekeeper: How Peer Feedback Functions in a High School Writing Class
Marsh, V. L. (2018) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte201829865 · Cited by 8
Modeling Student Evaluations of Writing and Authors as a Function of Writing Errors
Roscoe, R. D., Wilson, J., Patchan, M. M., Chen, D., & Johnson, A. C. (2020) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2020.10316 · Cited by 10
Promoting equitable achievement in STEM: lab report writing and online peer review
Culver, K. C., Bowman, N. A., Youngerman, E., Jang, N., & Just, C. L. (2020) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2020.1799315 · Cited by 9
Exploring Construct and Consequential Validity of Collaborative Learning Assessment in Higher Education
Meijer, H., Brouwer, J., Hoekstra, R., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2022) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10464964221095545 · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Can Students Review Their Peers?
Pirttinen, N., & Leinonen, J. (2022) · ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE) · doi:10.1145/3502718.3524762 · Cited by 8

Authors: Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J.-W.
Affiliations: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author: Panadero, Ernesto
ORCID: Panadero, Ernesto
Strijbos, Jan-Willem
Venue: Studies in Educational Evaluation
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2013-12
Volume: 39
Issue: 4
Pages: 195-203
ISSN: 0191-491X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005
OpenAlex: W1989213880
Cited by: 195
References: 70
Citations by year: 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6
FWCI: 38.72
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
figshare.com
Licence: cc-by
Locations: Studies In Educational Evaluation (publishedVersion)
Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics: Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and Assessment
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords: peer assessment, assessment rubrics, construct validity, concept maps, peer feedback, perceived fairness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The impact of a rubric and friendship on peer assessment: Effects on construct validity, performance, and perceptions of fairness and comfort

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks