Cited by 542Smart Cities and TechnologiesQuality of Life MeasurementSustainable Urban and Rural Development

Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the Smart Cities initiative

Marsal-Llacuna, Maria-Lluïsa, Colomer-Llinàs, Joan, Meléndez-Frigola, Joaquim·2015·Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.012

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marsal-Llacuna, M.-L., Colomer-Llinàs, J., & Meléndez-Frigola, J.
Affiliations
Universitat de Girona (ES)
Corresponding author
Marsal-Llacuna, Maria-Lluïsa
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
90
Pages
611-622
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995180899
Cited by
542
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 3
FWCI
33.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Quality of Life Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Sustainable Urban and Rural Development
Keywords
smart cities, urban monitoring, sustainable cities, urban livability, synthetic indicators, principal component analysis, urban indicators, real-time data, quality of life index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review