Cited by 538Misinformation and Its ImpactsCommunication and COVID-19 ImpactPublic Relations and Crisis Communication

Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: an affordance and cognitive load perspective.

Open access
Islam, A.K.M. Najmul, Laato, Samuli, Talukder, Shamim, Sutinen, Erkki·2020·Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Abstract

Social media plays a significant role during pandemics such as COVID-19, as it enables people to share news as well as personal experiences and viewpoints with one another in real-time, globally. Building off the affordance lens and cognitive load theory, we investigate how motivational factors and personal attributes influence social media fatigue and the sharing of unverified information during the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, we develop a model which we analyse using the structural equation modelling and neural network techniques with data collected from young adults in Bangladesh (N = 433). The results show that people, who are driven by self-promotion and entertainment, and those suffering from deficient self-regulation, are more likely to share unverified information. Exploration and religiosity correlated negatively with the sharing of unverified information. However, exploration also increased social media fatigue. Our findings indicate that the different use purposes of social media introduce problematic consequences, in particular, increased misinformation sharing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120201

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Use of social media during the pandemic was associated with feeling overwhelmed due to information overload related to COVID-19 and had a significant impact on users' wellbeing.

    “Recent studies conducted showed that the use of social media during the pandemic was associated with feeling overwhelmed due to information overload related to COVID-19, and had a significant impact on users’ wellbeing (41).”

    From The Evolution of Psychological and Behavioral Consequences of Self-Isolation During Lockdown: A Longitudinal Study Across United Kingdom and Italy (2022) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Introduction links abundant COVID-19 information to information overload and heightened health anxiety, and the Research model and hypotheses section explains how increased social media use may lead to overload and fatigue. The paper does not establish a significant impact of pandemic social media use on users’ overall wellbeing; that part of the claim goes beyond what it reports. The cited passages have no page numbers in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Barbieri, T., Basso, G., & Scicchitano, S. (2020). Italian Workers at Risk During the Covid-19 Epidemic. Available at SSRN 3572065.
  2. Campbell H.A. Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds 2012 Routledge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Islam, A. K. M. N., Laato, S., Talukder, S., & Sutinen, E.
Affiliations
University of Turku (FI)
Corresponding author
Islam, A.K.M. Najmul
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
159
Pages
120201
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3042114636
Cited by
538
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 114 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 15
FWCI
121.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Technological Forecasting and Social Change (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTUPub (University of Turku) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • LUTPub (LUT University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Keywords
misinformation sharing, social media fatigue, COVID-19 pandemic, affordance theory, cognitive load theory, unverified information, entertainment motivation, self-regulation, exploration, religiosity, young adults, motivations for social media use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review