Cited by 182Impact of Technology on AdolescentsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourChild Development and Digital Technology

The impact of type of content use on smartphone addiction and academic performance: Physical activity as moderator

Abbasi, Ghazanfar A, Jagaveeran, Mahavithya, Goh, Yen-Nee, Tariq, Beenish·2021·Technology in Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101521

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abbasi, G. A., Jagaveeran, M., Goh, Y.-N., & Tariq, B.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
  • Institute of Business Administration Karachi (PK)
Corresponding author
  • Abbasi, Ghazanfar A
  • Goh, Yen-Nee
Venue
Technology in Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
64
Pages
101521
ISSN
0160-791X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120897159
Cited by
182
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 13
FWCI
39.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technology in Society (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
smartphone addiction, academic performance, physical activity, moderating effect, entertainment use, social networking sites, undergraduate students, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review