The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The somatic marker hypothesis: still many questions but no answers
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, these data challenge previous research that suggests non-conscious intuitive signals dominate decisional choices in the early stages of the IGT (e.g., Bowman et al., 2005; Maia and McClelland, 2005; Fernie and Tunney, 2006, 2013).”
From Performance Under Stress: An Eye-Tracking Investigation of the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) (2018) · cites this paper as Maia and McClelland, 2005
Citations
Cites
Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts
Dias, R., Robbins, T. W., & Roberts, A. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380069a0 · Cited by 1,527
Rolls, E. T., Hornak, J., Wade, D., & McGrath, J. (1994) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.57.12.1518 · Cited by 1,005
Hornak, J., O'Doherty, J., Bramham, J., Rolls, E. T., Morris, R. G., Bullock, P. R., & Polkey, C. E. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892904322926791 · Cited by 603
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Bechara, 2005, The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers, Trends Cogn. Sci., 9, 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Maia, 2004, A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa gambling task, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 101, 16075, 10.1073/pnas.0406666101 · DOI · Paper page
- Bechara, 1997, Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy, Science, 275, 1293, 10.1126/science.275.5304.1293 · DOI · Paper page
- Clark, 2004, The neuropsychology of ventral prefrontal cortex: Decision-making and reversal learning, Brain Cogn., 55, 41, 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00284-7 · DOI · Paper page
- Fellows, 2005, Different underlying impairments in decision-making following ventromedial and dorsolateral frontal lobe damage in humans, Cereb. Cortex, 15, 58, 10.1093/cercor/bhh108 · DOI
- Bechara, 2000, Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex, Cereb. Cortex, 10, 295, 10.1093/cercor/10.3.295 · DOI · Paper page
- Fellows, 2003, Ventromedial frontal cortex mediates affective shifting in humans: evidence from a reversal learning paradigm, Brain, 126, 1830, 10.1093/brain/awg180 · DOI · Paper page
- Rolls, 1983, Responses of striatal neurons in the behaving monkey: 1. Head of the caudate nucleus, Behav. Brain Res., 7, 179, 10.1016/0166-4328(83)90191-2 · DOI
- Ongur, 2000, The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans, Cereb. Cortex, 10, 206, 10.1093/cercor/10.3.206 · DOI · Paper page
- Killcross, 1997, Different types of fear-conditioned behaviour mediated by separate nuclei within amygdala, Nature, 388, 377, 10.1038/41097 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation
Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001 · Cited by 894
Figner, B., Mackinlay, R. J., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. U. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0014983 · Cited by 625
Hornak, J., O'Doherty, J., Bramham, J., Rolls, E. T., Morris, R. G., Bullock, P. R., & Polkey, C. E. (2004) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892904322926791 · Cited by 603
Feelings and the body: the Jamesian perspective on autonomic specificity of emotion
Friedman, B. H. (2010) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.006 · Cited by 178
Neural correlates of developmental differences in risk estimation and feedback processing
van Leijenhorst, L., Crone, E. A., & Bunge, S. A. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.02.002 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Maia, T. V., & McClelland, J. L.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 162-164
- ISSN
- 1364-6613
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The somatic marker hypothesis: still many questions but no answers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.006
- The paper
- Maia, T. V., & McClelland, J. L. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: still many questions but no answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.006
