Cited by 260Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

Frames and brains: elicitation and control of response tendencies

Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane·2007·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Using magnetic resonance imaging, De Martino and colleagues investigated the neural signature that is associated with decisions between small sure amounts of money and large riskier amounts when the framing of the outcomes is varied. We interpret their results within a dual-system framework, in which different frames evoke distinct emotional responses that different individuals can suppress to various degrees. The study advances the integration of brain imaging results into cognitive theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.007

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss aversion may reflect a simple Pavlovian approach-avoidance response mediated by the amygdala.

    “Our findings demonstrate that the amygdala plays a necessary role in generating loss aversion and suggest that loss aversion may reflect a simple Pavlovian approach–avoidance response mediated by the amygdala (36, 37).”

    From Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion (2010) · cites this paper as [36]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Kahneman, Daniel
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
45-46
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050183244
Cited by
260
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
framing effects, risk-based decision making, dual-system theory, emotional responses, response tendencies
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review