Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 855

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of the parahippocampal cortex in cognition

Open access
Aminoff, Elissa M., Kveraga, Kestutis, Bar, Moshe·2013·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

The parahippocampal cortex (PHC) has been associated with many cognitive processes, including visuospatial processing and episodic memory. To characterize the role of PHC in cognition a framework is required that unifies these disparate processes. An overarching account was proposed, whereby the PHC is part of a network of brain regions that processes contextual associations. Contextual associations are the principal element underlying many higher-level cognitive processes, and thus are suitable for unifying the PHC literature. Recent findings are reviewed that provide support for the contextual associations account of PHC function. In addition to reconciling a vast breadth of literature, the synthesis presented expands the implications of the proposed account and gives rise to new and general questions about context and cognition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.009

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 97

  1. Bar, 2003, Cortical analysis of visual context, Neuron, 38, 347, 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00167-3 · DOI
  2. Aminoff, 2007, The parahippocampal cortex mediates spatial and nonspatial associations, Cereb. Cortex, 17, 1493, 10.1093/cercor/bhl078 · DOI
  3. Insausti, 1998, MR volumetric analysis of the human entorhinal, perirhinal, and temporopolar cortices, Am. J. Neuroradiol., 19, 659
  4. Reber, 2002, Encoding activity in the medial temporal lobe examined with anatomically constrained fMRI analysis, Hippocampus, 12, 363, 10.1002/hipo.10018 · DOI
  5. Furtak, 2012, Single neuron activity and theta modulation in postrhinal cortex during visual object discrimination, Neuron, 76, 976, 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.039 · DOI
  6. Suzuki, 1996, Neuroanatomy of the monkey entorhinal, perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices: organization of cortical inputs and interconnections with amygdala and striatum, Sem. Neurosci., 8, 3, 10.1006/smns.1996.0002 · DOI
  7. Blatt, 2003, Parcellation of cortical afferents to three distinct sectors in the parahippocampal gyrus of the rhesus monkey: an anatomical and neurophysiological study, J. Comp. Neurol., 466, 161, 10.1002/cne.10866 · DOI
  8. Muñoz, 2005, Cortical efferents of the entorhinal cortex and the adjacent parahippocampal region in the monkey (Macaca fascicularis), Eur. J. Neurosci., 22, 1368, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04299.x · DOI
  9. Nasr, 2011, Scene-selective cortical regions in human and nonhuman primates, J. Neurosci., 31, 13771, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2792-11.2011 · DOI
  10. Baldassano, 2013, Differential connectivity within the parahippocampal place area, Neuroimage, 75, 236, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.073 · DOI
  11. Zola-Morgan, 1989, Lesions of perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment, J. Neurosci., 9, 4355, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-12-04355.1989 · DOI
  12. Davachi, 2003, Multiple routes to memory: distinct medial temporal lobe processes build item and source memories, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 100, 2157, 10.1073/pnas.0337195100 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Epstein, 1998, A cortical representation of the local visual environment, Nature, 392, 598, 10.1038/33402 · DOI
  14. Stevens, 2012, Hemispheric asymmetry of visual scene processing in the human brain: evidence from repetition priming and intrinsic activity, Cereb. Cortex, 22, 1935, 10.1093/cercor/bhr273 · DOI
  15. Mullally, 2011, A new role for the parahippocampal cortex in representing space, J. Neurosci., 31, 7441, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0267-11.2011 · DOI
  16. Park, 2011, Disentangling scene content from spatial boundary: complementary roles for the parahippocampal place area and lateral occipital complex in representing real-world scenes, J. Neurosci., 31, 1333, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3885-10.2011 · DOI
  17. Kravitz, 2011, Real-world scene representations in high-level visual cortex: it's the spaces more than the places, J. Neurosci., 31, 7322, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4588-10.2011 · DOI
  18. Aguirre, 1996, The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man, Cereb. Cortex, 6, 823, 10.1093/cercor/6.6.823 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Janzen, 2007, Neural representation of navigational relevance is rapidly induced and long lasting, Cereb. Cortex, 17, 975, 10.1093/cercor/bhl008 · DOI
  20. Gosselin, 2006, Emotional responses to unpleasant music correlates with damage to the parahippocampal cortex, Brain, 129, 2585, 10.1093/brain/awl240 · DOI
  21. Mitterschiffthaler, 2007, A functional MRI study of happy and sad affective states induced by classical music, Hum. Brain Mapp., 28, 1150, 10.1002/hbm.20337 · DOI
  22. Stock, 2012, Affective scenes influence fear perception of individual body expressions, Hum. Brain Mapp.
  23. Levy, 2001, Center–periphery organization of human object areas, Nat. Neurosci., 4, 533, 10.1038/87490 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Rajimehr, 2011, The ‘parahippocampal place area’ responds preferentially to high spatial frequencies in humans and monkeys, PLoS Biol., 9, e1000608, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000608 · DOI
  25. Arnott, 2008, Crinkling and crumpling: An auditory fMRI study of material properties, Neuroimage, 43, 368, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.033 · DOI
  26. Engelien, 2006, Functional neuroanatomy of non-verbal semantic sound processing in humans, J. Neural Transm., 113, 599, 10.1007/s00702-005-0342-0 · DOI
  27. Kjelvik, 2012, The human brain representation of odor identification, J. Neurophysiol., 108, 645, 10.1152/jn.01036.2010 · DOI
  28. Cerf-Ducastel, 2009, Age-related differences in the neural substrates of cross-modal olfactory recognition memory: an fMRI investigation, Brain Res., 1285, 88, 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.05.086 · DOI
  29. Alvarez, 2001, Differential effects of damage within the hippocampal region on memory for a natural, nonspatial odor-odor association, Learn Mem., 8, 79, 10.1101/lm.38201 · DOI
  30. Mellet, 2000, Neural correlates of topographic mental exploration: the impact of route versus survey perspective learning, Neuroimage, 12, 588, 10.1006/nimg.2000.0648 · DOI
  31. Aguirre, 1999, Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy, Brain, 122, 1613, 10.1093/brain/122.9.1613 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Eacott, 2005, The roles of perirhinal cortex, postrhinal cortex, and the fornix in memory for objects, contexts, and events in the rat, Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B, 58, 202, 10.1080/02724990444000203 · DOI
  33. Malkova, 2003, One-trial memory for object–place associations after separate lesions of hippocampus and posterior parahippocampal region in the monkey, J. Neurosci., 23, 1956, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-05-01956.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Epstein, 2010, How reliable are visual context effects in the parahippocampal place area?, Cereb. Cortex, 20, 294, 10.1093/cercor/bhp099 · DOI
  35. Maguire, 1998, Knowing where things are: parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual large-scale space, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 10, 61, 10.1162/089892998563789 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Sommer, 2005, Dissociable contributions within the medial temporal lobe to encoding of object–location associations, Learn Mem., 12, 343, 10.1101/lm.90405 · DOI
  37. Kirwan, 2004, Medial temporal lobe activation during encoding and retrieval of novel face–name pairs, Hippocampus, 14, 919, 10.1002/hipo.20014 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Tendolkar, 2008, Contributions of the medial temporal lobe to declarative memory retrieval: manipulating the amount of contextual retrieval, Learn Mem., 15, 611, 10.1101/lm.916708 · DOI
  39. Düzel, 2003, Human hippocampal and parahippocampal activity during visual associative recognition memory for spatial and nonspatial stimulus configurations, J. Neurosci., 23, 9439, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-28-09439.2003 · DOI
  40. Henke, 1999, Human hippocampus associates information in memory, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 96, 5884, 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5884 · DOI
  41. Hales, 2009, Dissociation of frontal and medial temporal lobe activity in maintenance and binding of sequentially presented paired associates, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 21, 1244, 10.1162/jocn.2009.21096 · DOI
  42. Yang, 2008, Decreased parahippocampal activity in associative priming: evidence from an event-related fMRI study, Learn Mem., 15, 703, 10.1101/lm.900108 · DOI
  43. Hayes, 2007, The effect of scene context on episodic object recognition: parahippocampal cortex mediates memory encoding and retrieval success, Hippocampus, 17, 873, 10.1002/hipo.20319 · DOI
  44. Wang, 2013, Dissociable neural correlates of item and context retrieval in the medial temporal lobes, Behav. Brain Res., 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.029 · DOI
  45. Staresina, 2011, Perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices differentially contribute to later recollection of object- and scene-related event details, J. Neurosci., 31, 8739, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4978-10.2011 · DOI
  46. Diana, 2007, Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model, Trends Cogn. Sci., 11, 379, 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.001 · DOI
  47. Burwell, 2004, Perirhinal and postrhinal contributions to remote memory for context, J. Neurosci., 24, 11023, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3781-04.2004 · DOI
  48. Litman, 2009, Category-specificity in the human medial temporal lobe cortex, Hippocampus, 19, 308, 10.1002/hipo.20515 · DOI
  49. Brewer, 1998, Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered, Science, 281, 1185, 10.1126/science.281.5380.1185 · DOI
  50. Wagner, 1998, Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity, Science, 281, 1188, 10.1126/science.281.5380.1188 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Bar, 2008, Scenes unseen: the parahippocampal cortex intrinsically subserves contextual associations, not scenes or places per se, J. Neurosci., 28, 8539, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0987-08.2008 · DOI
  52. Aminoff, 2008, The cortical underpinnings of context-based memory distortion, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 20, 2226, 10.1162/jocn.2008.20156 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Bar, 2007, The units of thought, Hippocampus, 17, 420, 10.1002/hipo.20287 · DOI
  54. Kveraga, 2011, Early onset of neural synchronization in the contextual associations network, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 108, 3389, 10.1073/pnas.1013760108 · DOI
  55. Peters, 2009, Associations evoked during memory encoding recruit the context-network, Hippocampus, 19, 141, 10.1002/hipo.20490 · DOI
  56. Norman-Haignere, 2012, Category-selective background connectivity in ventral visual cortex, Cereb. Cortex, 22, 391, 10.1093/cercor/bhr118 · DOI
  57. Brown, 2013, Contributions of medial temporal lobe and striatal memory systems to learning and retrieving overlapping spatial memories, Cereb. Cortex
  58. Diana, 2012, Adaptation to cognitive context and item information in the medial temporal lobes, Neuropsychologia, 50, 3062, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.035 · DOI
  59. Li, 2012, Associative information processing in parahippocampal place area (PPA): an fMRI study, Brain Informatics, 7670, 1, 10.1007/978-3-642-35139-6_1 · DOI
  60. Bar, 1996, Spatial context in recognition, Perception, 25, 343, 10.1068/p250343 · DOI
  61. Biederman, 1982, Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations, Cogn. Psychol., 14, 143, 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90007-X · DOI
  62. Diana, 2008, High-resolution multi-voxel pattern analysis of category selectivity in the medial temporal lobes, Hippocampus, 18, 536, 10.1002/hipo.20433 · DOI
  63. Hannula, 2013, Medial temporal lobe contributions to cued retrieval of items and contexts, Neuropsychologia, 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.02.011 · DOI
  64. Robinson, 2011, Involvement of retrosplenial cortex in forming associations between multiple sensory stimuli, Behav. Neurosci., 125, 578, 10.1037/a0024262 · DOI
  65. Keene, 2008, Involvement of the retrosplenial cortex in processing multiple conditioned stimuli, Behav. Neurosci., 122, 651, 10.1037/0735-7044.122.3.651 · DOI
  66. Smith, 2012, Complimentary roles of the hippocampus and retrosplenial cortex in behavioral context discrimination, Hippocampus, 22, 1121, 10.1002/hipo.20958 · DOI
  67. Jenkins, 2010, Prefrontal and medial temporal lobe activity at encoding predicts temporal context memory, J. Neurosci., 30, 15558, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1337-10.2010 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Turk-Browne, 2012, Scene representations in parahippocampal cortex depend on temporal context, J. Neurosci., 32, 7202, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0942-12.2012 · DOI
  69. Diaconescu, 2011, The co-occurrence of multisensory facilitation and cross-modal conflict in the human brain, J. Neurophysiol., 106, 2896, 10.1152/jn.00303.2011 · DOI
  70. Lavenex, 2000, Hippocampal–neocortical interaction: a hierarchy of associativity, Hippocampus, 10, 420, 10.1002/1098-1063(2000)10:4<420::AID-HIPO8>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
  71. Epstein, 2007, Differential parahippocampal and retrosplenial involvement in three types of visual scene recognition, Cereb. Cortex, 17, 1680, 10.1093/cercor/bhl079 · DOI
  72. Hadjikhani, 2009, Early (M170) activation of face-specific cortex by face-like objects, Neuroreport, 20, 403, 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328325a8e1 · DOI
  73. Gauthier, 1999, Activation of the middle fusiform ‘face area’ increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects, Nat. Neurosci., 2, 568, 10.1038/9224 · DOI
  74. Nestor, 2011, Unraveling the distributed neural code of facial identity through spatiotemporal pattern analysis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 108, 9998, 10.1073/pnas.1102433108 · DOI
  75. Chai, 2010, Scene complexity: influence on perception, memory, and development in the medial temporal lobe, Front. Hum. Neurosci., 4, 21, 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00021 · DOI
  76. Jenkins, 2010, Cultural differences in the lateral occipital complex while viewing incongruent scenes, Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci., 5, 236, 10.1093/scan/nsp056 · DOI
  77. Rauchs, 2008, Partially segregated neural networks for spatial and contextual memory in virtual navigation, Hippocampus, 18, 503, 10.1002/hipo.20411 · DOI
  78. Eichenbaum, 2001, The hippocampus and declarative memory: cognitive mechanisms and neural codes, Behav. Brain Res., 127, 199, 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00365-5 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Shenhav, 2013, Affective value and associative processing share a cortical substrate, Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 13, 46, 10.3758/s13415-012-0128-4 · DOI
  80. Arcaro, 2009, Retinotopic organization of human ventral visual cortex, J. Neurosci., 29, 10638, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2807-09.2009 · DOI
  81. Barrett, 2011, Context in emotion perception, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 20, 286, 10.1177/0963721411422522 · DOI
  82. Bilalić, 2010, Mechanisms and neural basis of object and pattern recognition: a study with chess experts, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 139, 728, 10.1037/a0020756 · DOI
  83. Kim, 2011, Neural correlates related to action observation in expert archers, Behav. Brain Res., 223, 342, 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.04.053 · DOI
  84. Cheung, 2012, Visual prediction and perceptual expertise, Int. J. Psychophysiol., 83, 156, 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.11.002 · DOI
  85. Boycott, 1991, Morphological classification of bipolar cells of the primate retina, Eur. J. Neurosci., 3, 1069, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1991.tb00043.x · DOI · Paper page
  86. Kveraga, 2007, Magnocellular projections as the trigger of top-down facilitation in recognition, J. Neurosci., 27, 13232, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3481-07.2007 · DOI
  87. Goodale, 1992, Separate visual pathways for perception and action, Trends Neurosci., 15, 20, 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Merigan, 1993, How parallel are the primate visual pathways?, Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 16, 369, 10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002101 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Kaplan, 1986, The primate retina contains two types of ganglion cells, with high and low contrast sensitivity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 83, 2755, 10.1073/pnas.83.8.2755 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Tootell, 1988, Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. IV. Contrast and magno–parvo streams, J. Neurosci., 8, 1594, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-05-01594.1988 · DOI
  91. Wiesel, 1966, Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey, J. Neurophysiol., 29, 1115, 10.1152/jn.1966.29.6.1115 · DOI
  92. Cavada, 1989, Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey: I. Parcellation of areas based on distinctive limbic and sensory corticocortical connections, J. Comp. Neurol., 287, 393, 10.1002/cne.902870402 · DOI
  93. Canolty, 2006, High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex, Science, 313, 1626, 10.1126/science.1128115 · DOI · Paper page
  94. Engel, 2001, Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing, Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2, 704, 10.1038/35094565 · DOI · Paper page
  95. Cornwell, 2008, Human hippocampal and parahippocampal theta during goal-directed spatial navigation predicts performance on a virtual Morris water maze, J. Neurosci., 28, 5983, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5001-07.2008 · DOI
  96. Atienza, 2011, Semantic congruence enhances memory of episodic associations: role of theta oscillations, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 23, 75, 10.1162/jocn.2009.21358 · DOI
  97. Deese, 1962, On the structure of associative meaning, Psychol. Rev., 69, 161, 10.1037/h0045842 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 855

Metadata

Authors
Aminoff, E. M., Kveraga, K., & Bar, M.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
379-390
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153017955
Cited by
855
References
16
FWCI
2.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.