Cited by 145Social and Intergroup PsychologyMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Social Cognition 2.0: An Interactive Memory Systems Account

Open access
Amodio, David M.·2019·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

For 40 years, research on impression formation and attitudes has relied on dual-process theories that represent knowledge in a single associative network. Although such models explain priming effects and some implicit responses, they are generally silent on other forms of learning and on the interface of social cognition with perception and action. Meanwhile, advances in cognitive neuroscience reveal multiple, interacting forms of learning and memory (e.g., semantic associative memory, Pavlovian conditioning, and instrumental learning), with detailed models of their operations, neural bases, and connections with perceptual and behavioral systems. This memory systems perspective offers a more refined, neurally plausible model of social cognition and attitudes that, I argue, provides a useful and generative account of human social behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.002

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In realistic interactions, appropriate responses often depend on implicit constraints such as user state, goals, or values that are not explicitly queried later.

    “appropriate responses often depend on implicit constraints such as user state, goals, or values that are not explicitly queried later”
  • In realistic interactions, appropriate responses often depend on implicit constraints such as user state, goals, or values that are not explicitly queried later.

    “In realistic interactions, appropriate responses often depend on implicit constraints such as user state, goals, or values that are not explicitly queried later.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amodio, D. M.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Amodio, David M.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
21-33
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901419247
Cited by
145
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • US National Science Foundation (BCS 1551826)
  • Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (VICI 016.185.058)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
social cognition, memory systems, dual-process theory, impression formation, attitudes, associative memory, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, implicit learning
MeSH terms
Animals, Attitude, Brain, Humans, Memory, Models, Psychological, Psychological Theory, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review