The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scaling up difficulties and commercial aspects of edible films for food packaging: A review
Abstract
Abstract Background Edible food packaging, produced from edible polymers, is a kind of packaging suitable for human consumption along with the contained food. Despite many advantages, the edible films are still produced in laboratory scale due to problems, such as lack of poor elongation, safety and health issues, high cost, processing difficulties, etc. It is essential to overcome these difficulties for scaling up the production to industrial scale and making the edible films commercially successful. Scope & approach Even though some reviews on edible films and coatings have little discussed, there is no dedicated article on scaling up difficulties and commercial aspects of edible films. This article reviews the research progress, confronting problems, and research opportunities ahead for the industrial scaling up and commercial success for edible films in food packaging. Key findings & conclusions Incorporation of plasticizer, production of multilayers, composites, and nanocomposite films improved the properties significantly, but some fundamental research on the key factors are still not investigated. Current laboratory scale production of edible films has problems like inability to make continuous films, long drying time and inaccurate thickness control, which must be addressed before the industrial scaling up production. Lack of evidence on edibility, biodegradability, toxicological and health effects, inadequate marketing, lack of awareness, cultural issues, can affect the food safety and customer acceptance. Future research must address all these problems from the view of industrial scaling up and commercial aspects in order to make the industrially viable and commercially successful edible films.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abdul Khalil, H. P. S., Davoudpour, Y., Islam, M. N., Mustapha, A., Sudesh, K., Dungani, R., & Jawaid, M. (2014) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.069 · Cited by 1,333
Cellulosic Bionanocomposites: A Review of Preparation, Properties and Applications
Siqueira, G., Bras, J., & Dufresne, A. (2010) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym2040728 · Cited by 1,328
Edible and biodegradable polymer films: challenges and opportunities
Krochta, J. M., & Mulder-Johnston, C. D. (1997) · Food technology · Cited by 1,080
Edible films and coatings: Structures, active functions and trends in their use
Falguera, V., Quintero, J. P., Jiménez, A., Muñoz, J. A., & Ibarz, A. (2011) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2011.02.004 · Cited by 939
Advances in Edible Coatings for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: A Review
Dhall, R. K. (2013) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2010.541568 · Cited by 884
Active Packaging Technologies with an Emphasis on Antimicrobial Packaging and its Applications
Suppakul, P., Miltz, J., Sonneveld, K., & Bigger, S. W. (2003) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05687.x · Cited by 882
Oxygen and aroma barrier properties of edible films: A review
Miller, K. S., & Krochta, J. M. (1997) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/s0924-2244(97)01051-0 · Cited by 729
Edible Films and Coatings: Tomorrow's Packagings: A Review
Debeaufort, F., Quezada-Gallo, J.-A., & Voilley, A. (1998) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408699891274219 · Cited by 726
Nano-emulsions: Formation by low-energy methods
Solans, C., & Solé, I. (2012) · Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2012.07.003 · Cited by 698
Acevedo-Fani, A., Salvia-Trujillo, L., Rojas-Graü, M. A., & Martín-Belloso, O. (2015) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.01.032 · Cited by 651
Cited by
Edible packaging: Sustainable solutions and novel trends in food packaging
Trajkovska Petkoska, A., Daniloski, D., D'Cunha, N. M., Naumovski, N., & Broach, A. T. (2021) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109981 · Cited by 473
Kocira, A., Kozłowicz, K., Panasiewicz, K., Staniak, M., Szpunar-Krok, E., & Hortyńska, P. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11050813 · Cited by 391
Edible films and coatings for food packaging applications: a review
Kumar, L., Ramakanth, D., Akhila, K., & Gaikwad, K. K. (2022) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-021-01339-z · Cited by 389
Tannic acid: A green crosslinker for biopolymer-based food packaging films
Zhang, W., Roy, S., Ezati, P., Yang, D.-P., & Rhim, J.-W. (2023) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2023.04.004 · Cited by 339
Need for Sustainable Packaging: An Overview
Ibrahim, I. D., Hamam, Y., Sadiku, E. R., Ndambuki, J. M., Kupolati, W. K., Jamiru, T., Eze, A. A., & Snyman, J. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14204430 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeya Jeevahan, J., Chandrasekaran, M., Venkatesan, S. P., Sriram, V., Britto Joseph, G., Mageshwaran, G., & Durairaj, R. B.
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 100
- Pages
- 210-222
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3018467532
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scaling up difficulties and commercial aspects of edible films for food packaging: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.014
- The paper
- Jeya Jeevahan, J., Chandrasekaran, M., Venkatesan, S. P., Sriram, V., Britto Joseph, G., Mageshwaran, G., & Durairaj, R. B. (2020). Scaling up difficulties and commercial aspects of edible films for food packaging: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.