Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scaling up difficulties and commercial aspects of edible films for food packaging: A review

Jeya Jeevahan, J., Chandrasekaran, M., Venkatesan, S.P., Sriram, V., Britto Joseph, G., Mageshwaran, G., Durairaj, R.B.·2020·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Abstract Background Edible food packaging, produced from edible polymers, is a kind of packaging suitable for human consumption along with the contained food. Despite many advantages, the edible films are still produced in laboratory scale due to problems, such as lack of poor elongation, safety and health issues, high cost, processing difficulties, etc. It is essential to overcome these difficulties for scaling up the production to industrial scale and making the edible films commercially successful. Scope & approach Even though some reviews on edible films and coatings have little discussed, there is no dedicated article on scaling up difficulties and commercial aspects of edible films. This article reviews the research progress, confronting problems, and research opportunities ahead for the industrial scaling up and commercial success for edible films in food packaging. Key findings & conclusions Incorporation of plasticizer, production of multilayers, composites, and nanocomposite films improved the properties significantly, but some fundamental research on the key factors are still not investigated. Current laboratory scale production of edible films has problems like inability to make continuous films, long drying time and inaccurate thickness control, which must be addressed before the industrial scaling up production. Lack of evidence on edibility, biodegradability, toxicological and health effects, inadequate marketing, lack of awareness, cultural issues, can affect the food safety and customer acceptance. Future research must address all these problems from the view of industrial scaling up and commercial aspects in order to make the industrially viable and commercially successful edible films.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.014

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 86 references

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Jeya Jeevahan, J., Chandrasekaran, M., Venkatesan, S. P., Sriram, V., Britto Joseph, G., Mageshwaran, G., & Durairaj, R. B.
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
100
Pages
210-222
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3018467532
Cited by
334
References
86
FWCI
9.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scaling up difficulties and commercial aspects of edible films for food packaging: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.014
The paper
Jeya Jeevahan, J., Chandrasekaran, M., Venkatesan, S. P., Sriram, V., Britto Joseph, G., Mageshwaran, G., & Durairaj, R. B. (2020). Scaling up difficulties and commercial aspects of edible films for food packaging: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.04.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.