Cited by 502Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyDevelopmental Biology and Gene Regulation

Systematic mapping of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans identifies common modifiers of diverse signaling pathways

Lehner, Ben, Crombie, Catriona, Tischler, Julia, Fortunato, Angelo, Fraser, Andrew G·2006·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Most heritable traits, including disease susceptibility, are affected by interactions between multiple genes. However, we understand little about how genes interact because very few possible genetic interactions have been explored experimentally. We have used RNA interference in Caenorhabditis elegans to systematically test approximately 65,000 pairs of genes for their ability to interact genetically. We identify approximately 350 genetic interactions between genes functioning in signaling pathways that are mutated in human diseases, including components of the EGF/Ras, Notch and Wnt pathways. Most notably, we identify a class of highly connected 'hub' genes: inactivation of these genes can enhance the phenotypic consequences of mutation of many different genes. These hub genes all encode chromatin regulators, and their activity as genetic hubs seems to be conserved across animals. We propose that these genes function as general buffers of genetic variation and that these hub genes may act as modifier genes in multiple, mechanistically unrelated genetic diseases in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ng1844

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synthetic genetic interaction screens in yeast show thousands of combinations of individually viable mutations can be jointly lethal, with similar examples in Drosophila and C. elegans.

    “Synthetic genetic interaction screens in yeast123,124 have demonstrated that thousands of combinations of individually viable mutations can jointly be lethal, and similar examples have been documented in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans125,126.”

    From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [126]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehner, B., Crombie, C., Tischler, J., Fortunato, A., & Fraser, A. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Siena (IT)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Fraser, Andrew G
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2006-07-16
Volume
38
Issue
8
Pages
896-903
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W2052815101
Cited by
502
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 40
FWCI
15.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
Keywords
genetic interactions, genetic modifiers, hub genes, chromatin regulators, signaling pathways, Notch signaling, Wnt signaling, RNAi screen, genetic buffering, disease susceptibility, Caenorhabditis elegans
MeSH terms
Animals, Chromosome Mapping, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Epidermal Growth Factor, Female, Humans, Mutation, Phenotype, Vulva, Signal Transduction, Caenorhabditis elegans, Genes, Helminth, RNA Interference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review