Cited by 296Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Where Are the Disease-Associated eQTLs?

Open access
Umans, Benjamin D., Battle, Alexis, Gilad, Yoav·2021·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

Most disease-associated variants, although located in putatively regulatory regions, do not have detectable effects on gene expression. One explanation could be that we have not examined gene expression in the cell types or conditions that are most relevant for disease. Even large-scale efforts to study gene expression across tissues are limited to human samples obtained opportunistically or postmortem, mostly from adults. In this review we evaluate recent findings and suggest an alternative strategy, drawing on the dynamic and highly context-specific nature of gene regulation. We discuss new technologies that can extend the standard regulatory mapping framework to more diverse, disease-relevant cell types and states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2020.08.009

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low dimensional embeddings of EHR data can be generated by separately considering medical services, doctors, and patients in shallow network embeddings and graph neural networks.

    “Low dimensional embeddings of EHR data can be generated by separately considering medical services, doctors, and patients in shallow network embeddings (Section 2.1) and graph neural networks (Section 2.2) [202, 203].”

    From Graph representation learning in biomedicine and healthcare (2022) · cites this paper as [203]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Umans, B. D., Battle, A., & Gilad, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Umans, Benjamin D.
  • Battle, Alexis
  • Gilad, Yoav
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
109-124
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3083216853
Cited by
296
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R35GM131726, R01GM120167)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
disease-associated variants, expression quantitative trait loci, gene expression regulation, regulatory mapping, cell type-specific gene expression, tissue-specific gene expression, cell states, regulatory variants
MeSH terms
Animals, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Gene Expression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Quantitative Trait Loci

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review