Cited by 478Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyMemory and Neural Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Forward frontal fields: phylogeny and fundamental function

Open access
Wise, Steven P.·2008·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

The largest part of the primate prefrontal cortex has no homolog in other mammals. Accordingly, it probably confers some advantage that other mammals either lack or attain through the function of other structures. Yet, this advantage remains enigmatic. This is not so for other parts of the cortex. For example, certain visual areas encode, represent and store knowledge about objects. By analogy, perhaps the primate prefrontal cortex encodes, represents and stores knowledge about behaviors, including the consequences of doing (or not doing) something in complex and challenging situations. The long list of functions often attributed to the prefrontal cortex could contribute to knowing what to do and what will happen when rare risks arise or outstanding opportunities knock.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2008.08.008

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Goldman-Rakic, 1987, Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behaviour by representational memory, Vol. 5, 373

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 478

Metadata

Authors
Wise, S. P.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Wise, Steven P.
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
599-608
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020287268
Cited by
478
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (Z01MH001092)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, phylogeny, primate evolution, cognitive function, behavioral knowledge, object knowledge, risk assessment, decision-making, comparative neuroanatomy
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Phylogeny, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review