Cited by 85Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The CHRNA5–A3–B4 Gene Cluster and Smoking: From Discovery to Therapeutics

Open access
Lassi, Glenda, Taylor, Amy E., Timpson, Nicholas J., Kenny, Paul J., Mather, Robert J., Eisen, Tim, Munafò, Marcus R.·2016·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified associations between the CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4 gene cluster and smoking heaviness and nicotine dependence. Studies in rodents have described the anatomical localisation and function of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) formed by the subunits encoded by this gene cluster. Further investigations that complemented these studies highlighted the variability of individuals' smoking behaviours and their ability to adjust nicotine intake. GWASs of smoking-related health outcomes have also identified this signal in the CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4 gene cluster. This insight underpins approaches to strengthen causal inference in observational data. Combining genetic and mechanistic studies of nicotine dependence and smoking heaviness may reveal novel targets for medication development. Validated targets can inform genetic therapeutic interventions for smoking cessation and tobacco-related diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2016.10.005

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lassi, G., Taylor, A. E., Timpson, N. J., Kenny, P. J., Mather, R. J., Eisen, T., & Munafò, M. R.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Lassi, Glenda
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
39
Issue
12
Pages
851-861
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2555564065
Cited by
85
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • British Heart Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001425)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K023195/1)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA030929)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, smoking heaviness, nicotine dependence, smoking cessation, smoking-related diseases, causal inference, nicotinic receptor subunits
MeSH terms
Animals, Multigene Family, Humans, Receptors, Nicotinic, Smoking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review