Cited by 49Probiotics and Fermented FoodsClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchGut microbiota and health

Probiotics for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in older patients: a systematic review

Xie, Chunhong, Li, Jiajing, Wang, Kejia, Li, Qinqin, Chen, Daorong·2015·Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease

Abstract

Objective Here, we evaluated the efficacy of probiotic interventions in prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD) and Clostridium difficile diarrhoea (CDD) in older patients.Methods PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched from their dates of inception to May 2014. Only randomised controlled trials reporting data on probiotics including Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Saccharomyces, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, and Bacillus-alone or in combination-versus placebo or absence of treatment in older patients (age ≥65 years) were included. Risk ratios (RRs) for AAD and CDD relative to placebo or absence of treatment were estimated.Results Six trials with a total of 3562 patients were included. Only one trial showed that Bacillus licheniformis was effective for preventing AAD in older patients. However, there was no preventive effect for AAD and CDD with Lactobacillus acidophilus (Florajen), Lactobacillus casei Shirota, Saccharomyces cerevisiae (boulardii) lyo, mixture of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum (Cultech strains), and mixture of Lactobacillus acidophilus CUL60, CUL21, Bifidobacterium bifidum CUL20 and B. lactis CUL34.Conclusions Our findings indicate that probiotics may not reduce the risk of AAD and CDD in older patients. However, with current published data, it is difficult to draw concrete conclusions. To confirm these findings, sample sizes, multi-centre, double-blind studies that consider factors such as probiotic strains and types of antibiotics are required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tmaid.2015.03.001

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xie, C., Li, J., Wang, K., Li, Q., & Chen, D.
Affiliations
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Daorong
Venue
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
128-134
ISSN
1477-8939 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053155609
Cited by
49
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Research Fund of Chongqing Municipal Health Bureau (2009-2-345)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, older adults, Bacillus licheniformis, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Saccharomyces boulardii, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, probiotic strains
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Diarrhea, Humans, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review