Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 835

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure

Open access
Hardman, Scott, Jenn, Alan, Tal, Gil, Axsen, Jonn, Beard, George, Daina, Nicolo, Figenbaum, Erik, Jakobsson, Niklas, Jochem, Patrick, Kinnear, Neale, Plötz, Patrick, Pontes, Jose, Refa, Nazir, Sprei, Frances, Turrentine, Tom, Witkamp, Bert·2018·Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
DOI 10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a literature review of studies that investigate infrastructure needs to support the market introduction of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs). It focuses on literature relating to consumer preferences for charging infrastructure, and how consumers interact with and use this infrastructure. This includes studies that use questionnaire surveys, interviews, modelling, GPS data from vehicles, and data from electric vehicle charging equipment. These studies indicate that the most important location for PEV charging is at home, followed by work, and then public locations. Studies have found that more effort is needed to ensure consumers have easy access to PEV charging and that charging at home, work, or public locations should not be free of cost. Research indicates that PEV charging will not impact electricity grids on the short term, however charging may need to be managed when the vehicles are deployed in greater numbers. In some areas of study the literature is not sufficiently mature to draw any conclusions from. More research is especially needed to determine how much infrastructure is needed to support the roll out of PEVs. This paper ends with policy implications and suggests avenues of future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.002

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 79 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Adepetu, 2016, An agent-based electric vehicle ecosystem model: San Francisco case study, Transp. Policy, 46, 109, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.11.012 · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.11.012
  2. Axsen, 2012, Who can recharge a plug-in electric vehicle at home?, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 17, 349, 10.1016/j.trd.2012.03.001 · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2012.03.001
  3. California Air Resources Board, 2017. California ’ s Advanced Clean Cars Midterm Review Appendix G: Plug-in Electric Vehicle In-Use and Charging Data Analysis 29.
  4. Ensslen, A., Jochem, P., Rometsch, M., Fichtner, W., 2016. Chapter 8 Adoption of E in the French German context. In: Cross-Border Mobility for Electric Vehicles.
  5. Funke, S.A., Plötz, P., 2017. A techno-economic analysis of fast charging needs in Germany for different ranges of battery electric vehicles. In: Eur. Batter. Hybrid Fuel Cell Electr. Veh. Congr., pp. 1–7.
  6. Gnann, T., Goldbach, D., Jakobsson, N., Plötz, P., Bennehag, A., Sprei, F., 2016. A Model for Public Fast Charging Infrastructure Needs, pp. 1–12. · doi:10.3390/wevj8040943
  7. Jakobsson, N., Karlsson, S., Sprei, F., 2016b. How are driving patterns adjusted to the use of a battery electric vehicle in two-car households? In: EVS 2016 - 29th Int. Electr. Veh. Symp., pp. 1–10. · DOI
  8. Nicholas, 2013, California statewide charging assessment model for plug-in electric vehicles: learning from statewide travel surveys, Inst. Transp. Stud., 1
  9. Sovacool, 2017, The neglected social dimensions to a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) transition: a critical review, Environ. Res. Lett
  10. Sperling, 2014, California ’ s climate and energy policy for transportation, Energy Strateg. Rev., 5, 88, 10.1016/j.esr.2014.10.001 · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2014.10.001
  11. Tal, 2013, Charging behavior impacts on electric vehicle miles travel: who is not plugging in?, Inst. Transp. Stud., 3, 21
  12. Vergis, 2015, Comparison of plug-in electric vehicle adoption in the United States: a state by state approach, Res. Transp. Econ., 52, 56, 10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.003 · doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2015.10.003
  13. Vergis, 2010, Technology innovation and policy: a case study of the California ZEV Mandate, Stock. Enviorn. Inst., 1

Cited by

See all 835

Metadata

Authors
Hardman, S., Jenn, A., Tal, G., Axsen, J., Beard, G., Daina, N., Figenbaum, E., Jakobsson, N., Jochem, P., Kinnear, N., Plötz, P., Pontes, J., Refa, N., Sprei, F., Turrentine, T., & Witkamp, B.
Venue
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
62
Pages
508-523
ISSN
1361-9209 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.002
OpenAlex
W2797656660
Cited by
835
References
79
FWCI
17.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
ClimateWorks Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.002
The paper
Hardman, S., Jenn, A., Tal, G., Axsen, J., Beard, G., Daina, N., Figenbaum, E., Jakobsson, N., Jochem, P., Kinnear, N., Plötz, P., Pontes, J., Refa, N., Sprei, F., Turrentine, T., & Witkamp, B. (2018). A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.