The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units
Open accessAbstract
Genomic data have the potential to revolutionize the delineation of conservation units (CUs) by allowing the detection of adaptive genetic variation, which is otherwise difficult for rare, endangered species. In contrast to previous recommendations, we propose that the use of neutral versus adaptive markers should not be viewed as alternatives. Rather, neutral and adaptive markers provide different types of information that should be combined to make optimal management decisions. Genetic patterns at neutral markers reflect the interaction of gene flow and genetic drift that affects genome-wide variation within and among populations. This population genetic structure is what natural selection operates on to cause adaptive divergence. Here, we provide a new framework to integrate data on neutral and adaptive markers to protect biodiversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482
A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation
Haldane, J. B. S. (1927) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100015644 · Cited by 1,326
SNPs in ecology, evolution and conservation
Morin, P. A., Luikart, G., Wayne, R. K., & the SNP workshop group (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.009 · Cited by 1,080
The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation
Pritchard, J. K., Pickrell, J. K., & Coop, G. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.055 · Cited by 932
The role of geography in human adaptation
Coop, G., Pickrell, J. K., Novembre, J., Kudaravalli, S., Li, J., Absher, D., Myers, R. M., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Feldman, M. W., & Pritchard, J. K. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000500 · Cited by 412
Cited by
Finding the genomic basis of local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions
Hoban, S., Kelley, J. L., Lotterhos, K. E., Antolin, M. F., Bradburd, G., Lowry, D. B., Poss, M. L., Reed, L. K., Storfer, A., & Whitlock, M. C. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/688018 · Cited by 876
“…in agriculture, forestry, and fi sheries and can improve management decisions for threatened species by predicting the performance of a genotype in a new en-* vironment (Funk et al. 2012; Aitken and Whitlock 2013; Li et al. 2014; Yoder et al. 2014; Lasky et al. 2015; Hamilton and Miller 2016).”
Whiteley, A. R., Fitzpatrick, S. W., Funk, W. C., & Tallmon, D. A. (2015) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.009 · Cited by 813
Self-citationPopulation genomics for wildlife conservation and management
Hohenlohe, P. A., Funk, W. C., & Rajora, O. P. (2021) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.15720 · Cited by 702
Self-citationCoates, D. J., Byrne, M., & Moritz, C. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00165 · Cited by 460
Conserving intraspecific variation for nature’s contributions to people
Des Roches, S., Pendleton, L. H., Shapiro, B., & Palkovacs, E. P. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01403-5 · Cited by 253
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Self-citationPecoraro, C., Babbucci, M., Franch, R., Rico, C., Papetti, C., Chassot, E., Bodin, N., Cariani, A., Bargelloni, L., & Tinti, F. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32331-3 · Cited by 80
Barth, J. M. I., Damerau, M., Matschiner, M., Jentoft, S., & Hanel, R. (2017) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evx067 · Cited by 62
“Differentiation between populations connected by gene flow is often limited to genomic regions underlying traits involved in local adaptation (Funk et al. 2012) that are easily missed when only few markers are employed.”
BackgroundBenham, P. M., & Bowie, R. C. K. (2023) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esac066 · Cited by 39
Conservation Genomics in a Changing Arctic
Colella, J. P., Talbot, S. L., Brochmann, C., Taylor, E. B., Hoberg, E. P., & Cook, J. A. (2020) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2019.09.008 · Cited by 38
Service, C. N., Bourbonnais, M., Adams, M. S., Henson, L., Neasloss, D., Picard, C., Paquet, P. C., & Darimont, C. T. (2020) · Ecological Solutions and Evidence · doi:10.1002/2688-8319.12014 · Cited by 15
Adaptive genomic divergence parallels migratory behavior in Atlantic bluefin tuna
Mikles, C. S., Pagniello, C. M. L. S., Bigal, E., Moran, B. M., Rooker, J. R., Ortega, A., de la Gándara, F., Maxwell, H., Schallert, R., Castleton, M. R., et al. (2026) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.04.006 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Funk, W. C., McKay, J. K., Hohenlohe, P. A., & Allendorf, F. W.
- Venue
- Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 489-496
- ISSN
- 0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2028256931
- Cited by
- 1,117
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
