Cited by 81Research on Leishmaniasis StudiesVector-borne infectious diseasesBrucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment

Current situation of Leishmania infantum infection in shelter dogs in northern Spain

Open access
Miró, Guadalupe, Checa, Rocío, Montoya, Ana, Hernández, Leticia, Dado, Diana, Gálvez, Rosa·2012·Parasites & Vectors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Canine leishmaniosis (CanL) caused by Leishmania infantum is a widespread endemic disease in the Mediterranean basin, though, so far, the north of Spain has been considered a non-endemic area. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of specific antibodies to L. infantum among stray dogs living in shelters in this area, and to evaluate the clinical status (both clinical signs and clinico-pathological abnormalities) of seropositive dogs. Besides L. infantum infection, the epidemiological role of variables like sex, breed and age was also assessed. METHODS: Over the year 2011 a cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 418 stray dogs. A preliminary entomological survey was carried out using CDC-light traps. The chi-squared test was used to examine relationships between L. infantum seroprevalence and the remaining variables. RESULTS: The overall seroprevalence of L. infantum infection detected was 3% in the Cantabrian coast. In Orense the seroprevalence was 35.6%. In this latter region, the presence of sand fly, Phlebotomus perniciosus was also detected.In general, seropositivity for L. infantum was related to size (large breed dogs versus small) and age, with a significantly higher seroprevalence recorded in younger (0-3 years) and older dogs (> 7 years) than adult dogs. Clinical signs of CanL were observed in 41.3% of the seropositive dogs. The seropositivity for L. infantum infection associated with the presence of clinical signs and/or abnormal laboratory findings shows a prevalence of 4.5%. CONCLUSION: Our data provide new insight into the prevalence of CanL across northern Spain. The situation observed in Orense seems to be worsening compared to the few reports available, with figures being similar to those cited for known endemic areas of Spain. Besides, the presence of P. perniciosus in Orense points out to a risk of the spread of this zoonotic disease in this geographical area. These findings identify a need for an active search for the sand fly vectors of L. infantum across the entire northern spanish region including the rest of Galicia, Asturias, Cantabria and the Basque Country.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1756-3305-5-60

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gil Collado J Morillas Marquez F Sanchis Marin MC [Phlebotomu in Spain] Rev Sanid Hig Publica (Madr) 1989 63 15 34 2699769
  2. Houin R New locations of phlebotomi in Spain Ann Parasitol Hum Comp 1965 40 341 363 5842931

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miró, G., Checa, R., Montoya, A., Hernández, L., Dado, D., & Gálvez, R.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Miró, Guadalupe
Venue
Parasites & Vectors
Published
2012-03-27
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
60-60
ISSN
1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124903725
Cited by
81
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Parasites & Vectors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Bayer Animal Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
Keywords
canine leishmaniasis, Leishmania infantum, stray dogs, dog shelters, seroprevalence, Phlebotomus perniciosus, sand flies, zoonoses, clinical signs, northern Spain, Ourense, Cantabrian coast, vector surveillance
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Protozoan, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Leishmaniasis, Visceral, Male, Phlebotomus, Spain, Seroepidemiologic Studies, Leishmania infantum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review