Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans
Abstract
This study provides a time frame for the initial trajectory of activation flow along the dorsal and ventral visual processing streams and for the initial activation of prefrontal cortex in the human. We provide evidence that this widespread system of sensory, parietal, and prefrontal areas is activated in less than 30 ms, which is considerably shorter than typically assumed in the human event-related potential (ERP) literature and is consistent with recent intracranial data from macaques. We find a mean onset latency of activity over occipital cortex (C1(e)) at 56 ms, with dorsolateral frontal cortex subsequently active by just 80 ms. Given that activity in visual sensory areas typically continues for 100-400 ms prior to motor output, this rapid system-wide activation provides a time frame for the initiation of feedback processes onto sensory areas. There is clearly sufficient time for multiple iterations of interactive processing between sensory, parietal, and frontal areas during brief (e.g., 200 ms) periods of information processing preceding motor output. High-density electrical mapping also suggested activation in dorsal stream areas preceding ventral stream areas. Our data suggest that multiple visual generators are active in the latency range of the traditional C1 component of the ERP, which has often been taken to represent V1 activity alone. Based on the temporal pattern of activation shown in primate recordings and the evidence from these human recordings, we propose that only the initial portion of the C1 component (approximately the first 10-15 ms; C1(e)) is likely to represent a response that is predominated by V1 activity. These data strongly suggest that activity represented in the "early" ERP components such as P1 and N1 (and possibly even C1) is likely to reflect relatively late processing, after the initial volley of sensory afference through the visual system and involving top-down influences from parietal and frontal regions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
N1 is attributed to processing communication between the visual cortex and the dorsolateral frontal cortex.
“N1 is also attributed to the processing communication between the visual cortex and the dorsolateral frontal cortex (Foxe and Simpson, 2002).”
From Repetitive Religious Chanting Modulates the Late-Stage Brain Response to Fear- and Stress-Provoking Pictures (2017) · cites this paper as Foxe and Simpson, 2002
Processing is substantially faster via the dorsal stream, which would permit it to prime ventral stream areas.
“Processing is substantially faster via the dorsal stream, which would permit it to prime ventral stream areas (72–74).”
From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [72]
Cites
Schall, J. D., Morel, A., King, D., & Bullier, J. (1995) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-06-04464.1995 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
A systematic evaluation of the spherical model accuracy in EEG dipole localization
Yvert, B., Bertrand, O., Thévenet, M., et al. (1997) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0921-884x(97)96611-x · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cross-modal plasticity: where and how?
Bavelier, D., & Neville, H. J. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn848 · Cited by 1,040 · see citing works
Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis?
Yuille, A., & Kersten, D. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.002 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception
Barrett, L. F., & Bar, M. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0312 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey
Rockland, K. S., & Ojima, H. (2003) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00121-1 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia
Butler, P. D., Silverstein, S. M., & Dakin, S. C. (2008) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.023 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Subcortical visual dysfunction in schizophrenia drives secondary cortical impairments
Butler, P. D., Martinez, A., Foxe, J. J., Kim, D., Zemon, V., Silipo, G., Mahoney, J., Shpaner, M., Jalbrzikowski, M., & Javitt, D. C. (2007) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl233 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Self-citationBrandwein, A. B., Foxe, J. J., Butler, J. S., Russo, N. N., Altschuler, T. S., Gomes, H., & Molholm, S. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs109 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Self-citationThe time course of visual processing: Backward masking and natural scene categorisation
Bacon-Macé, N., Macé, M. J.-M., Fabre-Thorpe, M., & Thorpe, S. J. (2005) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.004 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Milne, E. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00051 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Foxe, J. J., Murray, M. M., & Javitt, D. C. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi069 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationBrandwein, A. B., Foxe, J. J., Butler, J. S., Frey, H.-P., Bates, J. C., Shulman, L. H., & Molholm, S. (2015) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2212-9 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationPerspectives on sensory processing disorder: a call for translational research
Miller, L. (2009) · Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.07.022.2009 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Milne, E., Scope, A., Pascalis, O., Buckley, D., & Makeig, S. (2009) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.07.017 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Sehatpour, P., Molholm, S., Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.049 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationRETRACTED: Impaired Visual Cortical Plasticity in Schizophrenia
Çavuş, I., Reinhart, R. M. G., Roach, B. J., Gueorguieva, R., Teyler, T. J., Clapp, W. C., Ford, J. M., Krystal, J. H., & Mathalon, D. H. (2012) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.01.013 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
RetractedNew insights into old waves. Matching stimulus- and response-locked ERPs on the same time-window
Berchicci, M., Spinelli, D., & Di Russo, F. (2016) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.04.007 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Wirth, M., Horn, H., Koenig, T., Stein, M., Federspiel, A., Meier, B., Michel, C., & Strik, W. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl121 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
TMS Over V5 Disrupts Motion Prediction
Vetter, P., Grosbras, M.-H., & Muckli, L. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht297 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Gao, J., Fan, J., Wu, B. W., Halkias, G. T., Chau, M., Fung, P. C., Chang, C., Zhang, Z., Hung, Y.-S., & Sik, H. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02055 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“N1 is also attributed to the processing communication between the visual cortex and the dorsolateral frontal cortex (Foxe and Simpson, 2002).”
BackgroundBeker, S., Foxe, J. J., & Molholm, S. (2021) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00329.2021 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationEarly cortical signals in visual stimulus detection
Kwon, H., Kronemer, S. I., Christison-Lagay, K. L., Khalaf, A., Li, J., Ding, J. Z., Freedman, N. C., & Blumenfeld, H. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118608 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Perceptual stability reflected in neuronal pattern similarities in human visual cortex
Broday-Dvir, R., Norman, Y., Harel, M., Mehta, A. D., & Malach, R. (2023) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112614 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Marcar, V. L., Battegay, E., Schmidt, D., & Cheetham, M. (2022) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2021.107994 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Foxe, J., & Simpson, G.
- Affiliations
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- ORCID
- Foxe, John
- Venue
- Experimental Brain Research
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 139-150
- ISSN
- 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1106
- OpenAlex
- W2397257824
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 43
- FWCI
- 14.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH011431, R03MH063434, MH11431)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS027900, NS27900)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- visual cortex activation, primary visual cortex, dorsal stream, ventral stream, prefrontal cortex, C1 component, event-related potentials, top-down processing, occipital cortex, parietal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Neural Conduction, Synaptic Transmission, Reaction Time, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review