Cited by 240Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Acceptance and commitment: Implications for prevention science

Open access
Biglan, Anthony, Hayes, Steven C., Pistorello, Jacqueline·2008·Prevention Science

Abstract

Recent research in behavior analysis and clinical psychology points to the importance of language processes having to do with the control of negative cognition and emotion and the commitment to valued action. Efforts to control unwanted thoughts and feelings, also referred to as experiential avoidance (EA), appear to be associated with a diverse array of psychological and behavioral difficulties. Recent research shows that interventions that reduce EA and help people to identify and commit to the pursuit of valued directions are beneficial for ameliorating diverse problems in living. These developments have the potential to improve the efficacy of many preventive interventions. This paper reviews the basic findings in these areas and points to some ways in which these developments could enhance the impact of preventive interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11121-008-0099-4

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Barnes-Holmes Y Barnes-Holmes D Smeets PM Strand P Friman P 2004 Testing and training relational responding in accordance with the relational frame of opposite in young children International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy 4 559 586
  2. Dahl J Wilson KG Luciano C Hayes SD 2005 Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and chronic pain Reno, NV Context Press
  3. Donaldson E Bond FW 2004 Psychological acceptance and emotional intelligence in relation to workplace wellbeing British Journal of Guidance and Counseling 34 187 203
  4. Erickson-Cornish JA Riva MT Cox-Henderson M Kominars KD McIntosh S 2000 Perceived distress in university counseling center clients over a six-year time span Journal of College Student Development 41 1 104 109
  5. Hayes SC 2004 Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Relational Frame Theory, and the third wave of behavior therapy Behavior Therapy 35 639 665 27993338
  6. Jakobsson C Wellin J 2006 ACT Stress i skolan: En tvåårsuppföljning av interventionsbehandlingen Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Uppsala Sweden
  7. Livheim F 2004 Acceptance and Commitment Therapy i skolan - att hantera stress: En randomiserad, kontrollerad studie Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Uppsala Sweden
  8. Luoma J Hayes SC Walser R in press Learning ACT Oakland, CA New Harbinger
  9. Marx BP Sloan DM 2005 Experiential avoidance, peritraumatic dissociation, and post-traumatic stress disorder Behaviour Research and Therapy 43 569 583 15865913
  10. Takahashi M Muto T Tada M Sugiyama M 2002 Acceptance rationale and increasing pain tolerance: Acceptance-based and FEAR-based practice Japanese Journal of Behavior Therapy 28 35 46
  11. Varra AA Hayes SC Roget N Fisher G 2007 Using mindfulness and acceptance to increase the impact of continuing education in pharmacotherapy American Journal of Psychiatry under review

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biglan, A., Hayes, S. C., & Pistorello, J.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Research Institute (US)
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Biglan, Anthony
Venue
Prevention Science
Published
2008-08-09
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
139-152
ISSN
  • 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6695
OpenAlex
W2090211322
Cited by
240
References
143
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (PA018760)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH074968, R21MH074968)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30DA018760, R01DA017868, DA018760, DA017868)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, experiential avoidance, prevention interventions, valued action, negative thinking, emotion regulation, intrusive thoughts
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Models, Psychological, Preventive Medicine, Psychology, Social, Behavioral Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review