Cited by 7Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Connections, Tracts, Fractals, and the Rest: A Working Guide to Network and Connectivity Studies in Neurosurgery

Open access
Hart, Michael G., Romero-Garcia, Rafael, Price, Stephen J., Santarius, Thomas, Suckling, John·2020·World Neurosurgery

Abstract

Brain mapping and connectomics can probe networks that span the entire brain, producing a diverse range of outputs for probing specific clinically relevant questions. The potential for understanding the effect of focal lesions on brain function, cognition, and plasticity abounds, any one of which would likely yield more effective and safer neurosurgical strategies. However, the possibilities of advanced magnetic resonance imaging and connectomics have been somewhat underused in neurosurgery, arising from actual or perceived difficulties in either application or analysis. The present review builds on previous work describing the theoretical attractions of connectomics to deliberate on the practical details of performing high-quality connectomics studies in neurosurgery. First, the data and methods involved in deriving connectomics models will be considered, specifically for the purpose of determining the nature of inferences that can be made subsequently. Next, a selection of key analysis methods will be explored using practical examples that illustrate their effective implementation and the insights that can be gleaned. The principles of study design will be introduced, including analysis tips and methods for making efficient use of available resources. Finally, a review of the best research practices for neuroimaging studies will be discussed, including principles of open access data sharing, study preregistration, and methods for improving replicability. Ultimately, we hope readers will be better placed to appraise the current connectomics studies in neurosurgery and empowered to develop their own high-quality studies, both of which are key steps in realizing the true potential of connectomics and advanced neuroimaging analyses in general.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.116

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The brain connectomic concept benefits traditional surgical strategy by enabling a potential shift from local topography to network-guided "oncological disconnection surgery".

    “The brain connectomic concept benefits traditional surgical strategy by a potential shift from focusing on local topography to a network-guided “oncological disconnection surgery” (Duffau, 2021; Hart et al., 2020).”

    From Quantitative mapping of the brain’s structural connectivity using diffusion MRI tractography: A review (2022) · cites this paper as Hart et al., 2020

    Section 3c (p. 9) describes connectomics as a holistic view of brain connectivity and discusses glioblastoma analyses that reveal surgical risks beyond standard structural imaging. The pre-operative glioma example (Figure 6 caption, p. 23) also illustrates network mapping. These passages support a potential move beyond local anatomy, but they do not propose a network-guided “oncological disconnection surgery.” (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hart, M. G., Romero-Garcia, R., Price, S. J., Santarius, T., & Suckling, J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Hart, Michael G.
Venue
World Neurosurgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
140
Pages
389-400
ISSN
1878-8750 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014706026
Cited by
7
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Guarantors of Brain
  • Brain Tumour Charity (GN-000335)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
connectomics, brain networks, neurosurgery, brain mapping, focal brain lesions, neuroplasticity, research design, open data sharing, replicability, advanced neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Neurosurgical Procedures, Neuroimaging, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review