Cited by 43Water Resource Management and QualityWater Governance and InfrastructureGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics

Community organized household water increases not only rural incomes, but also men’s work.

Crow, Ben, Swallow, Brent, Asamba, Isabella·2012·World Development

Abstract

This paper explores community-organized, household water supply in seven communities in western Kenya. We compare water use, labor use, income and the conditions for collective action in three sets of communities: two have protected springs and piped homestead connections; two have protected springs but no homestead connection; and three draw potentially contaminated water from unprotected springs. We find that piped water reduces the work of women and girls, and facilitates home garden and livestock production. Together these changes lead to increased household incomes. Women recognize clear time-benefits. Men, however, experience extra work. No overall pattern emerges regarding the preconditions for collective action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.08.002

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hilhorst, B., & Wennink, T. (2010). Strengthening women's livelihoods through collective action: Market opportunities in smallholder agriculture: Literature review . Amsterdam, Royal Tropical Institute: Development Policy and Practice.
  2. Onyango, L. (2009). Poverty, livelihoods and property rights in the Nyando Basin, Kenya: A case for integrated approaches to development planning. Ph.D. Thesis, Maseno University, Maseno, Kenya.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crow, B., Swallow, B., & Asamba, I.
Affiliations
  • University of California System (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
World Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
528-541
ISSN
0305-750X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964021402
Cited by
43
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • World Development (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
domestic water supply, community water management, protected springs, women's employment, child labor, household income, collective action, home gardens, animal husbandry, gender division of labor, rural households, Western Kenya

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review