Cited by 73Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsStress Responses and CortisolEpilepsy research and treatment

Basal cortisol is positively correlated to threat vigilance in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures

Open access
Bakvis, Patricia, Spinhoven, Philip, Roelofs, Karin·2009·Epilepsy & Behavior

Abstract

Previous studies have provided evidence for a vigilant attentional bias toward threat stimuli and increased basal diurnal cortisol levels in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). Because cortisol levels may be predictive of threat vigilance, we reanalyzed previous data on threat vigilance in 19 unmedicated patients with PNES and found a positive correlation between baseline cortisol levels and attentional bias scores for threat stimuli (r=0.49, P=0.035). There was no such relationship in healthy matched controls (n=20) or in patients with epileptic seizures (n=17). These findings provide the first evidence linking an endocrine stress marker to increased threat sensitivity in PNES and support new integrated psychoneurobiological models of PNES.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.09.006

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakvis, P., Spinhoven, P., & Roelofs, K.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Epilepsy & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
558-560
ISSN
1525-5050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049621745
Cited by
73
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsy & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Universiteit Leiden
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (#452-07-008)
  • Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, basal cortisol, threat vigilance, threat sensitivity, stress hormones, diurnal cortisol, epileptic seizures
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Attention, Emotions, Epilepsy, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Saliva, Statistics as Topic, Bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review