Cited by 296Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Emotional processing in functional neurological disorder: A review, biopsychosocial model and research agenda

Open access
Pick, Susannah, Goldstein, Laura H, Perez, David L, Nicholson, Timothy R·2019·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

Functional neurological disorder (FND) is a common and highly disabling disorder, but its aetiology remains enigmatic. Conceptually, there has been reduced emphasis on the role of psychosocial stressors in recent years, with a corresponding increase in neurobiological explanations. However, a wealth of evidence supports the role of psychosocial adversities (eg, stressful life events, interpersonal difficulties) as important risk factors for FND. Therefore, there is a need to integrate psychosocial (environmental) and neurobiological factors (eg, sensorimotor and cognitive functions) in contemporary models of FND. Altered emotional processing may represent a key link between psychosocial risk factors and core features of FND. Here, we summarise and critically appraise experimental studies of emotional processing in FND using behavioural, psychophysiological and/or neuroimaging measures in conjunction with affective processing tasks. We propose that enhanced preconscious (implicit) processing of emotionally salient stimuli, associated with elevated limbic reactivity (eg, amygdala), may contribute to the initiation of basic affective/defensive responses via hypothalamic and brainstem pathways (eg, periaqueductal grey). In parallel, affect-related brain areas may simultaneously exert a disruptive influence on neurocircuits involved in voluntary motor control, awareness and emotional regulation (eg, sensorimotor, salience, central executive networks). Limbic-paralimbic disturbances in patients with FND may represent one of several neurobiological adaptations linked to early, severe and/or prolonged psychosocial adversity. This perspective integrates neurobiological and psychosocial factors in FND and proposes a research agenda, highlighting the need for replication of existing findings, multimodal sampling across emotional response domains and further examination of emotional influences on sensorimotor and cognitive functions in FND populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319201

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A central issue in contemporary discussions of functional neurological disorder has been the extent to which emotions play a mechanistic and aetiological role.

    “A central issue in contemporary discussions has revolved around questioning the extent to which emotions play a mechanistic and aetiological role in FND.23,28,30,31”
  • Other proposed emotion processing mechanisms for FND are not incorrect, but rather incomplete, with a constructionist perspective addressing an important gap.

    “Furthermore, we think that other proposed emotion processing mechanisms for FND are not incorrect, but rather incomplete-with a constructionist perspective addressing an important gap.27,28”
  • Such miscalculations could predispose to chronic negative affect and altered predictions, which offers an explanatory framework for behavioural and physiological findings of altered responses to 'emotional' stimuli in people with FND.

    “Such 'miscalculations' could predispose to chronic negative affect and altered predictions, which offers an explanatory framework for behavioural and physiological findings of altered responses to 'emotional' stimuli in people with FND.27,28,44”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pick, S., Goldstein, L. H., Perez, D. L., & Nicholson, T. R.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Pick, Susannah
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-11-19
Volume
90
Issue
6
Pages
704-711
ISSN
  • 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-330X
OpenAlex
W2901870388
Cited by
296
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 19 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health Research (CS-2014-14-016)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1K23MH111983-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
conversion disorder, emotional processing, psychosocial adversity, biopsychosocial model, amygdala, periaqueductal gray, sensorimotor network, salience network, frontoparietal network, emotion regulation, stress, etiology
MeSH terms
Conversion Disorder, Emotions, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Nervous System Diseases, Psychology, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review