Cited by 8Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesEpilepsy research and treatmentNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Forced conceptual thought induced by electrical stimulation of the left prefrontal gyrus involves widespread neural networks

Open access
Liu, Anli, Friedman, Daniel, Barron, Daniel S., Wang, Xiuyuan, Thesen, Thomas, Dugan, Patricia·2020·Epilepsy & Behavior

Abstract

Background Early accounts of forced thought were reported at the onset of a focal seizure, and characterized as vague, repetitive, and involuntary intellectual auras distinct from perceptual or psychic hallucinations or illusions. Here, we examine the neural underpinnings involved in conceptual thought by presenting a series of 3 patients with epilepsy reporting intrusive thoughts during electrical stimulation of the left lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) during invasive surgical evaluation. We illustrate the widespread networks involved through two independent brain imaging modalities: resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) (rs-fMRI) and task-based meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM). Methods We report the clinical and stimulation characteristics of three patients with left hemispheric language dominance who demonstrate forced thought with functional mapping. To examine the brain networks underlying this phenomenon, we used the regions of interest (ROI) centered at the active electrode pairs. We modeled functional networks using two approaches: (1) rs-fMRI functional connectivity analysis, representing 81 healthy controls and (2) meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM), representing 8260 healthy subjects. We also determined the overlapping regions between these three subjects' rs-fMRI and MACM networks through a conjunction analysis. Results We identified that left PFC was associated with a large-scale functional network including frontal, temporal, and parietal regions, a network that has been associated with multiple cognitive functions including semantics, speech, attention, working memory, and explicit memory. Conclusions We illustrate the neural networks involved in conceptual thought through a unique patient population and argue that PFC supports this function through activation of a widespread network.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106644

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 8

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Allen IM (1952). Forced Thinking as part of the epileptic attack. New Zealand Medical Journal, 51(282), 86– 95. 14929419
  2. Ardila A, Bernal B, & Rosselli M (2016). How Localized are Language Brain Areas? A Review of Brodmann Areas Involvement in Oral Language. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 31(1), 112– 122. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acv081 26663825 · DOI
  3. Ashburner J (2007). A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage, 38(1), 95– 113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007 17761438 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barron DS, Fox PT (2015). BrainMap Database as a Resource for Computational Modeling In Toga AW (Ed.), Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic Reference (Vol. 1, pp. 675– 683): Academic Press.
  5. Cauda F, Cavanna AE, D'Agata F, Sacco K, Duca S, & Geminiani GC (2011). Functional connectivity and coactivation of the nucleus accumbens: a combined functional connectivity and structure-based meta-analysis. J Cogn Neurosci, 23(10), 2864– 2877. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21624 21265603 · DOI
  6. Cho YJ, Song SK, Jang SH, Chang JW, Lee BI, & Heo K (2011). Simple Partial Status of Forced Thinking Originated in the Mesial Temporal Region: Intracranial Foramen Ovale Electrode Recording and Ictal PET. J Epilepsy Res, 1(2), 77– 80. doi: 10.14581/jer.11015 24649451 PMC3952329 · DOI
  7. Dale AM, Fischl B, & Sereno MI (1999). Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage, 9(2), 179– 194. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 9931268 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Desikan RS, Segonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, … Killiany RJ (2006). An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage, 31(3), 968– 980. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 16530430 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Eickhoff SB, Bzdok D, Laird AR, Kurth F, & Fox PT (2012). Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage, 59(3), 2349– 2361. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017 21963913 PMC3254820 · DOI
  10. Eickhoff SB, Jbabdi S, Caspers S, Laird AR, Fox PT, Zilles K, & Behrens TE (2010). Anatomical and functional connectivity of cytoarchitectonic areas within the human parietal operculum. J Neurosci, 30(18), 6409– 6421. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5664-09.2010 20445067 PMC4791040 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Fincham JM, Carter CS, van Veen V, Stenger VA, & Anderson JR (2002). Neural mechanisms of planning: a computational analysis using event-related fMRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 99(5), 3346– 3351. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052703399 11880658 PMC122521 · DOI
  12. Fischl B, Sereno MI, & Dale AM (1999). Cortical surface-based analysis. II: Inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage, 9(2), 195– 207. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0396 9931269 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Fox KCR, Yih J, Raccah O, Pendekanti SL, Limbach LE, Maydan DD, & Parvizi J (2018). Changes in subjective experience elicited by direct stimulation of the human orbitofrontal cortex. Neurology, 91(16), e1519– e1527. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006358 30232252 PMC6202946 · DOI
  14. Fox PT, Laird AR, Fox SP, Fox PM, Uecker AM, Crank M, … Lancaster JL (2005). BrainMap taxonomy of experimental design: description and evaluation. Hum Brain Mapp, 25(1), 185– 198. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20141 15846810 PMC6871758 · DOI
  15. Freedman DJ, & Miller EK (2008). Neural mechanisms of visual categorization: insights from neurophysiology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 32(2), 311– 329. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.07.011 17950874 · DOI
  16. Freedman DJ, Riesenhuber M, Poggio T, & Miller EK (2001). Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science, 291(5502), 312– 316. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5502.312 11209083 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Price CJ, Buchel C, & Worsley KJ (1999). Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage, 10(4), 385– 396. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0484 10493897 · DOI
  18. Gillebert CR, Op de Beeck HP, Panis S, & Wagemans J (2009). Subordinate categorization enhances the neural selectivity in human object-selective cortex for fine shape differences. J Cogn Neurosci, 21(6), 1054– 1064. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21089 18752400 · DOI
  19. Gotts SJ, Milleville SC, Bellgowan PS, & Martin A (2011). Broad and narrow conceptual tuning in the human frontal lobes. Cereb Cortex, 21(2), 477– 491. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq113 20562319 PMC3020586 · DOI
  20. Jiang X, Bradley E, Rini RA, Zeffiro T, Vanmeter J, & Riesenhuber M (2007). Categorization training results in shape- and category-selective human neural plasticity. Neuron, 53(6), 891– 903. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.02.015 17359923 PMC1989663 · DOI
  21. Klein A, Andersson J, Ardekani BA, Ashburner J, Avants B, Chiang MC, … Parsey RV (2009). Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage, 46(3), 786– 802. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037 19195496 PMC2747506 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Koubeissi MZ, Fernandez-Baca Vaca G, Maciunas R, & Stephani C (2016). A white matter tract mediating awareness of speech. Neurology, 86(2), 177– 179. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002246 26643545 · DOI
  23. Kubler A, Dixon V, & Garavan H (2006). Automaticity and reestablishment of executive control-an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci, 18(8), 1331– 1342. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.8.1331 16859418 · DOI
  24. Laird AR, Eickhoff SB, Rottschy C, Bzdok D, Ray KL, & Fox PT (2013). Networks of task co-activations. Neuroimage, 80, 505– 514. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.073 23631994 PMC3720689 · DOI · Paper page
  25. McGill ML, Devinsky O, Wang X, Quinn BT, Pardoe H, Carlson C, … Thesen T (2014). Functional neuroimaging abnormalities in idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Neuroimage Clin, 6, 455– 462. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.10.008 25383319 PMC4221627 · DOI
  26. Mendez MF, Cherrier MM, & Perryman KM (1996). Epileptic forced thinking from left frontal lesions. Neurology, 47(1), 79– 83. 8710129
  27. Morrison C a. C. C (2015). Electrocortical Mapping of Language In Barr WB, and Morrison C (Ed.), Handbook on the Neuropsychology of Epilepsy (pp. 139– 154): Springer.
  28. Narayana S, Laird AR, Tandon N, Franklin C, Lancaster JL, & Fox PT (2012). Electrophysiological and functional connectivity of the human supplementary motor area. Neuroimage, 62(1), 250– 265. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.060 22569543 PMC3381058 · DOI
  29. Nathan SS, Sinha SR, Gordon B, Lesser RP, & Thakor NV (1993). Determination of current density distributions generated by electrical stimulation of the human cerebral cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 86(3), 183– 192. 7680994
  30. Nichols T, Brett M, Andersson J, Wager T, & Poline JB (2005). Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage, 25(3), 653– 660. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.005 15808966 · DOI
  31. Parvizi J, Rangarajan V, Shirer WR, Desai N, & Greicius MD (2013). The will to persevere induced by electrical stimulation of the human cingulate gyrus. Neuron, 80(6), 1359– 1367. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.057 24316296 PMC3877748 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Penfield W (1946). Psychical Seizures. British Medical Journal, 2(4478), 639– 641. 20786984 PMC2054605
  33. Popa I, Donos C, Barborica A, Opris I, Maliia MD, Ene M, … Mindruta I (2016). Intrusive Thoughts Elicited by Direct Electrical Stimulation during Stereo-Electroencephalography. Front Neurol, 7, 114. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00114 27486431 PMC4947963 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Ranganath C, Johnson MK, & D'Esposito M (2003). Prefrontal activity associated with working memory and episodic long-term memory. Neuropsychologia, 41(3), 378– 389. 12457762
  35. Rangarajan V, Hermes D, Foster BL, Weiner KS, Jacques C, Grill-Spector K, & Parvizi J (2014). Electrical stimulation of the left and right human fusiform gyrus causes different effects in conscious face perception. J Neurosci, 34(38), 12828– 12836. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0527-14.2014 25232118 PMC4166163 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Reyes A, Thesen T, Wang X, Hahn D, Yoo D, Kuzniecky R, … Blackmon K (2016). Resting-state functional MRI distinguishes temporal lobe epilepsy subtypes. Epilepsia, 57(9), 1475– 1484. doi: 10.1111/epi.13456 27374869 · DOI
  37. Robinson JL, Laird AR, Glahn DC, Blangero J, Sanghera MK, Pessoa L, … Fox PT (2012). The functional connectivity of the human caudate: an application of meta-analytic connectivity modeling with behavioral filtering. Neuroimage, 60(1), 117– 129. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.010 22197743 PMC3288226 · DOI
  38. Robinson JL, Laird AR, Glahn DC, Lovallo WR, & Fox PT (2010). Metaanalytic connectivity modeling: delineating the functional connectivity of the human amygdala. Hum Brain Mapp, 31(2), 173– 184. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20854 19603407 PMC2872058 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Rottschy C, Caspers S, Roski C, Reetz K, Dogan I, Schulz JB, … Eickhoff SB (2013). Differentiated parietal connectivity of frontal regions for "what" and "where" memory. Brain Struct Funct, 218(6), 1551– 1567. doi: 10.1007/s00429-012-0476-4 23143344 PMC3825581 · DOI
  40. Shallice T, Stuss DT, Alexander MP, Picton TW, & Derkzen D (2008). The multiple dimensions of sustained attention. Cortex, 44(7), 794– 805. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.04.002 18489960 · DOI
  41. Smith SM, Fox PT, Miller KL, Glahn DC, Fox PM, Mackay CE, … Beckmann CF (2009). Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106(31), 13040– 13045. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905267106 19620724 PMC2722273 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Song XW, Dong ZY, Long XY, Li SF, Zuo XN, Zhu CZ, … Zang YF (2011). REST: a toolkit for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data processing. PLoS One, 6(9), e25031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025031 21949842 PMC3176805 · DOI
  43. SU Schule CM, Luders HO (2008). General principles of cortical mapping by electrical stimulation In Luders H (Ed.), Textbook of Epilepsy Surgery (pp. 963– 977). United Kingdom: Informa Healthcare.
  44. Tanji J, Shima K, & Mushiake H (2007). Concept-based behavioral planning and the lateral prefrontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci, 11(12), 528– 534. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.007 18024183 · DOI
  45. Thesen T, Quinn BT, Carlson C, Devinsky O, DuBois J, McDonald CR, … Kuzniecky R (2011). Detection of epileptogenic cortical malformations with surface-based MRI morphometry. PLoS One, 6(2), e16430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016430 21326599 PMC3033882 · DOI
  46. Yang AI, Wang X, Doyle WK, Halgren E, Carlson C, Belcher TL, … Thesen T (2012). Localization of dense intracranial electrode arrays using magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 63(1), 157– 165. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.039 22759995 PMC4408869 · DOI

Authors
Liu, A., Friedman, D., Barron, D. S., Wang, X., Thesen, T., & Dugan, P.
Affiliations
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Anli
  • Friedman, Daniel
  • Barron, Daniel S.
  • Wang, Xiuyuan
  • Thesen, Thomas
  • Dugan, Patricia
Venue
Epilepsy & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
104
Issue
Pt A
Pages
106644
ISSN
1525-5050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000225586
Cited by
8
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsy & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
left prefrontal cortex, electrical stimulation, epilepsy, conceptual thinking, semantic processing, functional connectivity, large-scale brain networks, meta-analytic connectivity modeling, resting-state functional connectivity, language dominance
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Nerve Net, Retrospective Studies, Thinking, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review