Cited by 455Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 142 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Oxytocin modulates cooperation within and competition between groups: An integrative review and research agenda

De Dreu, Carsten K.W.·2012·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

The author reviews evidence that hypothalamic release (or infusion) of the neuropeptide oxytocin modulates the regulation of cooperation and conflict among humans because of three reasons. First, oxytocin enables social categorization of others into in-group versus out-group. Second, oxytocin dampens amygdala activity and enables the development of trust. Third, and finally, oxytocin up-regulates neural circuitries (e.g., inferior frontal gyrus, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus) involved in empathy and other-concern. Consistent with an evolutionary perspective on the functionality of cooperation, it is concluded that oxytocin-motivated cooperation is mostly parochial-it motivates (i) in-group favoritism, (ii) cooperation towards in-group but not out-group members, and (iii) defense-motivated non-cooperation towards threatening outsiders. Thus, in addition to its well-known role in reproduction and pair-bond formation, oxytocin's primary functions include in-group "tend-and-defend." This review concludes with avenues for new research on oxytocin's functions in within-group cooperation and between-group competition. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Social Behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.12.009

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 144 references

2 of the 144 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chen, 2011, Oxytocin-induced goodwill is not a fixed pie, Proc Natl A Sci USA, 108, E45
  2. Choi, 2007, The coevolution of parochial altruism and war, Science, 318, 636, 10.1126/science.1144237 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ostrom, 1998, A behavioural approach to the rational choice theory in collective action, Amer Pol Sci Rev, 92, 1, 10.2307/2585925 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 455

Metadata

Authors
De Dreu, C. K. W.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
419-428
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115705437
Cited by
455
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
oxytocin, cooperation, in-group favoritism, intergroup competition, social categorization, trust, amygdala, empathy, vasopressin, social behavior
MeSH terms
Competitive Behavior, Cooperative Behavior, Discrimination, Psychological, Empathy, Fear, Group Processes, Humans, Love, Oxytocin, Social Behavior, Recognition, Psychology, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review