Cited by 230CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringVirus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

AAV-CRISPR Gene Editing Is Negated by Pre-existing Immunity to Cas9

Open access
Li, Ang, Tanner, Mark R., Lee, Ciaran M., Hurley, Ayrea E., De Giorgi, Marco, Jarrett, Kelsey E., Davis, Timothy H., Doerfler, Alexandria M. +3 more·2020·Molecular Therapy

Abstract

Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors are a leading candidate for the delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for therapeutic genome editing in vivo . However, AAV-based delivery involves persistent expression of the Cas9 nuclease, a bacterial protein. Recent studies indicate a high prevalence of neutralizing antibodies and T cells specific to the commonly used Cas9 orthologs from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) and Staphylococcus aureus (SaCas9) in humans. We tested in a mouse model whether pre-existing immunity to SaCas9 would pose a barrier to liver genome editing with AAV packaging CRISPR-Cas9. Although efficient genome editing occurred in mouse liver with pre-existing SaCas9 immunity, this was accompanied by an increased proportion of CD8 + T cells in the liver. This cytotoxic T cell response was characterized by hepatocyte apoptosis, loss of recombinant AAV genomes, and complete elimination of genome-edited cells, and was followed by compensatory liver regeneration. Our results raise important efficacy and safety concerns for CRISPR-Cas9-based in vivo genome editing in the liver.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.04.017

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preexisting T-cell populations may represent a greater risk to gene-edited systemic tissues than antibodies at any prevalence or concentration.

    “preexisting T-cell populations may represent a greater risk to gene-edited systemic tissues than antibodies at any prevalence or concentration4–6.”

    From Investigation of Cas9 Antibodies in the Human Eye (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

  • Preexisting immunity indicates that Cas9 protein expressed by edited cells may lead to immunological activation, inflammation, and potentially killing of edited cells.

    “This preexisting immunity indicates that Cas9 protein expressed by edited cells may lead to immunological activation, inflammation, and potentially killing of edited cells—as has been demonstrated in vitro and in vivo4–6.”

    From Investigation of Cas9 Antibodies in the Human Eye (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

  • In mice, pre-existing SaCas9 immunity resulted in increased CTL response leading to hepatocyte apoptosis and loss of transgene.

    “Studies showed pre-existing SaCas9 immunity in mice resulted in increased CTL response leading to hepatocyte apoptosis and loss of transgene (112).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, A., Tanner, M. R., Lee, C. M., Hurley, A. E., De Giorgi, M., Jarrett, K. E., Davis, T. H., Doerfler, A. M., Bao, G., Beeton, C., & Lagor, W. R.
Affiliations
  • Rice University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bao, Gang
  • Beeton, Christine
  • Lagor, William R.
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
28
Issue
6
Pages
1432-1441
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016959969
Cited by
230
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
FWCI
11.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Health Research Alliance (cc-by)
Funders
  • American Heart Association (19POST34430092, 19PRE34380467, GM08231, HL007676, RR024574)
  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RR140081, RP180672)
  • National Institutes of Health (RR024574, HL007676, GM08231, CA125123, UG3HL151545, HL132840, U42OD026645)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
adeno-associated virus vectors, CRISPR/Cas9, SaCas9, pre-existing immunity, neutralizing antibodies, T cell response, hepatocyte apoptosis, compensatory liver regeneration, SpCas9
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Dependovirus, Animals, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Immunization, Immunologic Memory, Biomarkers, Gene Expression, Immunophenotyping, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Transgenes, Hepatocytes, Gene Order, Mice, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review