Cited by 85Physical Activity and HealthUrban Transport and AccessibilityMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Randomized trial of a neighborhood environment-focused physical activity website intervention

Ferney, Shannon L., Marshall, Alison L., Eakin, Elizabeth G., Owen, Neville·2009·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the use of a local neighborhood environment-focused physical activity website and its effects on walking and overall physical activity in middle-aged adults.Method One-hundred and six (72% women) inactive adults aged 52+/-4.6 years were randomly allocated to receive access to a neighborhood environment-focused website, (Neighborhood group, n=52) or a motivational-information website (Comparison group n=54). Participants also received eleven emails over the 26 weeks. Study outcomes were objectively-monitored website use, and self-reported total walking (min/wk), total physical activity (min/wk) and neighborhood walking (min/wk) collected at baseline, 12 and 26 weeks. The study was conducted between August 2005 and February 2006 in Brisbane, Australia.Results Website use was significantly greater among Neighborhood participants (p=0.01). Statistically significant increases in walking and total physical activity were observed in both groups. There was also a statistically significant interaction effect for total physical activity, with Neighborhood group participants maintaining more of their initial increase in physical activity at week-26 (p<0.05). Further, those in the Neighborhood group who used the website more often reported significantly more walking along the community trail at week-26 (p=0.05) compared with those who did not.Conclusions A local neighborhood-environment focused physical activity website was more effective at engaging participants than a motivational-information website. Moreover, its use resulted in meaningful increases in physical activity relative to the comparison website.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.10.022

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferney, S. L., Marshall, A. L., Eakin, E. G., & Owen, N.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
144-150
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992326773
Cited by
85
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Queensland Health
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
neighborhood environment, physical activity, walking, middle-aged adults, inactive adults, email reminders, internet use, physical activity maintenance
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Motor Activity, Pilot Projects, Queensland, Residence Characteristics, Social Support, Exercise, Walking, Focus Groups, Internet, Electronic Mail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review