Cited by 616Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietChild Development and Digital Technology

Tracking of sedentary behaviours of young people: A systematic review

Open access
Biddle, Stuart J.H., Pearson, Natalie, Ross, Gemma M., Braithwaite, Rock·2010·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objective To review the empirical evidence concerning the strength of tracking of sedentary behaviours from childhood and adolescence.Methods Published English language studies were located from computerised and manual searches in 2009. Included studies were prospective, longitudinal studies with at least one sedentary behaviour for at least two time-points, with tracking coefficients reported, and included children (aged 3-11 years) and adolescents (12-18 years) at baseline.Results Based on data from 21 independent samples, tracking coefficients (r) ranged from 0.08 (over 16 years) to 0.73 (over 2 years) for TV viewing, from 0.18 (boys over 3 years) to 0.52 (over 2 years) for electronic game/computer use, from 0.16 (girls over 4 years) to 0.65 (boys over 2 years) for total screen time, and from -0.15 (boys over 2 years) to 0.48 (over 1 year) for total sedentary time. Study follow-up periods ranged from 1 to up to 27 years, and tracking coefficients tended to be higher with shorter follow-ups.Conclusions Sedentary behaviours track at moderate levels from childhood or adolescence. Data suggest that sedentary behaviours may form the foundation for such behaviours in the future and some may track slightly better than physical activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.07.018

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. COHEN, J. (1988) Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Edition, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biddle, S. J. H., Pearson, N., Ross, G. M., & Braithwaite, R.
Affiliations
  • Loughborough University (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Biddle, Stuart J.H.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
345-351
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063626925
Cited by
616
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 27
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
sedentary behavior, childhood, adolescence, television viewing, screen time, computer use, sedentary time, youth
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Behavior, Child, Preschool, Computers, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Motor Activity, Television, Time, Health Behavior, Exercise, Video Games, Sedentary Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review