Cited by 123Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchInsect Resistance and GeneticsAgricultural safety and regulations

Ecological risk assessment for DvSnf7 RNA: A plant-incorporated protectant with targeted activity against western corn rootworm

Open access
Bachman, Pamela M., Huizinga, Kristin M., Jensen, Peter D., Mueller, Geoffrey, Tan, Jianguo, Uffman, Joshua P., Levine, Steven L.·2016·Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Abstract

MON 87411 maize, which expresses DvSnf7 RNA, was developed to provide an additional mode of action to confer protection against corn rootworm (Diabrotica spp.). A critical step in the registration of a genetically engineered crop with an insecticidal trait is performing an ecological risk assessment to evaluate the potential for adverse ecological effects. For MON 87411, an assessment plan was developed that met specific protection goals by characterizing the routes and levels of exposure, and testing representative functional taxa that would be directly or indirectly exposed in the environment. The potential for toxicity of DvSnf7 RNA was evaluated with a harmonized battery of non-target organisms (NTOs) that included invertebrate predators, parasitoids, pollinators, soil biota as well as aquatic and terrestrial vertebrate species. Laboratory tests evaluated ecologically relevant endpoints such as survival, growth, development, and reproduction and were of sufficient duration to assess the potential for adverse effects. No adverse effects were observed with any species tested at, or above, the maximum expected environmental concentration (MEEC). All margins of exposure for NTOs were >10-fold the MEEC. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that exposure to DvSnf7 RNA, both directly and indirectly, is safe for NTOs at the expected field exposure levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.08.001

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on numerous non-target species using the dsRNA targeting Snf7 in D. v. virgifera have demonstrated this specificity.

    “Studies on numerous non-target species using the dsRNA targeting Snf7 in D. v. virgifera have demonstrated this specificity (Bachmann et al., 2016).”

    From Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019) · cites this paper as Bachmann et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Grimm, C., Reber, B., Barth, M., Candolfi, M., Drexler, A., Maus, C., Moreth, L., Ufer, A., Waltersdorfer, A., Blümel, S., 2000. A Test for Evaluating the Chronic Effects of Plant Protection Products on the Rove Beetle Aleochara Bilineata Gyll. (Cole- optera: Staphylinidae) under Laboratory and Extended Laboratory Conditions. Guidelines to Evaluate Side-effects of Plant Protection Products to Non-target Arthropods, pp. 1e12.
  2. Stevens, C.E., Hume, I.D., 1995. Digestion of Carbohydrate, Lipids, and Protein and the Absorption of End Products. in Comparative Physiology of the Vertebrate Digestive System. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, pp. 152e187.
  3. U.S. EPA, 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. Federal Register 63(93): 26846e26924, EPA/630/R-95/002F.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bachman, P. M., Huizinga, K. M., Jensen, P. D., Mueller, G., Tan, J., Uffman, J. P., & Levine, S. L.
Affiliations
Monsanto (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Bachman, Pamela M.
Venue
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
81
Pages
77-88
ISSN
0273-2300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2476788712
Cited by
123
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Monsanto Company
  • California Agricultural Research Inc
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
western corn rootworm, Diabrotica, environmental risk assessment, non-target organisms, margin of exposure, non-target invertebrates, pollinators, soil organisms, aquatic vertebrates, terrestrial vertebrates, RNA toxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Coleoptera, Computer Simulation, Zea mays, Environmental Exposure, Humans, Pest Control, Biological, RNA, Double-Stranded, Species Specificity, Time Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Crops, Agricultural, Risk Assessment, Toxicity Tests, No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level, Computational Biology, Databases, Genetic, Plants, Genetically Modified, Food, Genetically Modified, RNA Interference, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Food Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review