Cited by 62Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural safety and regulationsInsect Resistance and Genetics

Assessing environmental impacts of genetically modified plants on non-target organisms: the relevance of in planta studies

Open access
Arpaia, Salvatore, Birch, A. Nicholas E., Kiss, Jozsef, van Loon, Joop J.A., Messéan, Antoine, Nuti, Marco, Perry, Joe N., Sweet, Jeremy B. +1 more·2017·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

In legal frameworks worldwide, genetically modified plants (GMPs) are subjected to pre-market environmental risk assessment (ERA) with the aim of identifying potential effects on the environment. In the European Union, the EFSA Guidance Document introduces the rationale that GMPs, as well as their newly produced metabolites, represent the potential stressor to be evaluated during ERA. As a consequence, during several phases of ERA for cultivation purposes, it is considered necessary to use whole plants or plant parts in experimental protocols. The importance of in planta studies as a strategy to address impacts of GMPs on non-target organisms is demonstrated, to evaluate both effects due to the intended modification in plant phenotype (e.g. expression of Cry proteins) and effects due to unintended modifications in plant phenotype resulting from the transformation process (e.g. due to somaclonal variations or pleiotropic effects). In planta tests are also necessary for GMPs in which newly expressed metabolites cannot easily be studied in vitro. This paper reviews the scientific literature supporting the choice of in planta studies as a fundamental tool in ERA of GMPs in cultivation dossiers; the evidence indicates they can realistically mimic the ecological relationships occurring in their receiving environments and provide important insights into the biology and sustainable management of GMPs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.039

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 105 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arpaia, S., Birch, A. N. E., Kiss, J., van Loon, J. J. A., Messéan, A., Nuti, M., Perry, J. N., Sweet, J. B., & Tebbe, C. C.
Affiliations
  • National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (IT)
  • James Hutton Institute (GB)
  • Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU)
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • University of Greenwich (GB)
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
Corresponding author
Arpaia, Salvatore
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
583
Pages
123-132
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2578956548
Cited by
62
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Seventh Framework Programme (289706)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Insect Resistance and Genetics
Keywords
transgenic plants, non-target organisms, environmental risk assessment, EFSA guidance, somaclonal variation, pleiotropy, Cry proteins, novel metabolites
MeSH terms
Ecology, Environment, Environmental Monitoring, European Union, Risk Assessment, Plants, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review