Cited by 86Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBehavioral Health and InterventionsNutritional Studies and Diet

Innovative Newsletter Interventions Improve Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Healthy Adults

LUTZ, SUSAN F, AMMERMAN, ALICE S, ATWOOD, JAN R, CAMPBELL, MARCI K, DeVELLIS, ROBERT F, ROSAMOND, WAYNE D·1999·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of computer-tailored newsletter interventions in improving the number and variety of fruits and vegetables eaten by adults.Design The 4-group randomized trial with pre- and postintervention measures consisted of a control group and 3 intervention groups receiving nontailored newsletters, computer-tailored newsletters, or tailored newsletters with tailored goal-setting information. Intervention groups received 1 newsletter each month for 4 months.Subjects Baseline surveys were completed by 710 health maintenance organization clients. Postintervention surveys administered 6 months after baseline were completed by 573 participants (80.8%).Intervention All newsletters contained strategies for improving fruit and vegetable consumption. Tailored newsletters used computer algorithms to match a person's baseline survey information with the most relevant newsletter messages for promoting dietary change.Main outcome measures Daily intake and weekly variety of fruits and vegetables were measured using a food frequency questionnaire.Statistical analyses performed Analysis of covariance and Tukey's honestly significant difference test were used to assess differences in the number and variety of fruits and vegetables consumed among intervention groups.Results For persons completing postintervention surveys (n = 573), all 3 newsletter groups had significantly higher daily intake and variety scores compared with the control group. Although there was a trend of improved intake and variety with each added newsletter element, there were no significant differences at follow-up among the newsletter groups.Conclusions Newsletters can be effective in improving the fruit and vegetable consumption of adults. In this study, a computer-tailoring system did not significantly enhance the effect of the nutrition newsletters on fruit and vegetable intake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-8223(99)00169-8

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LUTZ, S. F., AMMERMAN, A. S., ATWOOD, J. R., CAMPBELL, M. K., DeVELLIS, R. F., & ROSAMOND, W. D.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
LUTZ, SUSAN F
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
99
Issue
6
Pages
705-709
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965595024
Cited by
86
References
32
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
fruit and vegetable intake, computer-tailored intervention, goal setting, dietary change, healthy adults, food frequency questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adult, Diet, Educational Status, Female, Fruit, Health Education, Humans, Income, Male, Periodicals as Topic, Vegetables

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review