Cited by 171Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchCardiac Health and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A randomized controlled trial of the effect of psychotherapy on anxiety and depression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

de Godoy, Dagoberto V, de Godoy, Rossane F·2003·Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To assess the effect of psychotherapy on the anxiety and depression levels of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Design A blind, randomized, controlled trial.Setting Outpatient university pulmonary rehabilitation program in Brazil.Participants Thirty patients with COPD (mean age, 60.33y; 22 men) attending a pulmonary rehabilitation program were randomized into 2 groups: experimental group (G1) and control group (G2). Both groups underwent a 12-week treatment program.Interventions Group 1 (n=14) participated in 24 sessions of physical exercise, 24 sessions of physiotherapy, 12 psychologic sessions, and 3 educational sessions. Group 2 did not participate in psychotherapy sessions.Main outcome measures All patients were evaluated at baseline and at completion of the pulmonary rehabilitation program by using 3 instruments: the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD).Results Both groups showed statistically significant improvements on the 6MWD (G1, P<.001; G2, P=.03). Only G1 had a significant reduction in anxiety and depression levels (G1: BAI, P<.001; BDI, P<.001; G2: BAI, P=.156; BDI, P=.142). Statistically significant differences existed between G1 and G2 for BAI (P<.001) and BDI (P=.02).Conclusions Including psychotherapy in a pulmonary rehabilitation program for COPD reduced patients' anxiety and depression levels but did not modify 6MWD performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00239-9

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological therapies compared with co-intervention reduce anxiety in people with COPD (mean difference -4.41, 95% CI -8.28 to -0.53, P = 0.03).

    “Total *** 157 162 100% -4.41[-8.28,-0.53]Heterogeneity: Tau =7.21; Chi =5.2, df=2(P=0.07);I =61.51%Test for overall effect: Z=2.23(P=0.03)”
  • In the long term (6 to 12 months), psychological therapies compared with co-intervention do not significantly improve six minute walking distance in people with COPD (MD -30.08, 95% CI -170.92 to 110.77, P = 0.68).

    “Subtotal *** 132 136 100% -30.08[-170.92,110.77]Heterogeneity: Tau =8340.78;Chi =5.01, df=1(P=0.03);I =80.04%Test for overall effect: Z=0.42(P=0.68)”
  • In the short term (0 to 3 months), psychological therapies compared with co-intervention do not significantly improve six minute walking distance in people with COPD (MD 29.35, 95% CI -30.13 to 88.82, P = 0.33).

    “Subtotal *** 132 136 100% 29.35[-30.13,88.82]Heterogeneity: Tau =0; Chi =0.2, df=1(P=0.65);I =0% Test for overall effect: Z=0.97(P=0.33)”
  • In the short term (0 to 3 months), psychological therapies compared with co-intervention reduce anxiety in people with COPD (MD -3.86, 95% CI -6.63 to -1.10, P = 0.01).

    “Subtotal *** 157 162 100% -3.86[-6.63,-1.1]Heterogeneity: Tau =1.16; Chi =2.47, df=2(P=0.29);I =19.09%Test for overall effect: Z=2.74(P=0.01)”
  • Psychological therapies compared with co-intervention do not significantly improve six minute walking distance in people with COPD (MD -2.78, 95% CI -58.49 to 52.94, P = 0.92).

    “Total *** 132 136 100% -2.78[-58.49,52.94]Heterogeneity: Tau =0; Chi =5.01, df=1(P=0.03);I =80.04%Test for overall effect: Z=0.1(P=0.92)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Godoy, D. V., & de Godoy, R. F.
Venue
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
84
Issue
8
Pages
1154-1157
ISSN
0003-9993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082290270
Cited by
171
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, psychotherapy, anxiety, depression, pulmonary rehabilitation, exercise training, physiotherapy, 6-minute walk distance, psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Depression, Exercise Test, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Exercise Tolerance, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review