The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A change of 6.39 on the Y-BOCS was considered reliable.”
From A randomized clinical trial of acceptance and commitment therapy versus progressive relaxation training for obsessive-compulsive disorder (2010) · cites this paper as Jacobson, Follette, & Revenstorf, 1984
Citations
Cites
Wolf, M. M. (1978) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203 · Cited by 3,176
How we should measure "change": Or should we?
Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, L. (1970) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0029382 · Cited by 2,456
Meehl, P. E. (1978) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.46.4.806 · Cited by 2,061
Assessing the Clinical or Applied Importance of Behavior Change through Social Validation
Kazdin, A. E. (1977) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/014544557714001 · Cited by 1,117
The test of significance in psychological research.
Bakan, D. (1966) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0020412 · Cited by 957
The case against statistical significance testing
Carver, R. (1978) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.48.3.t490261645281841 · Cited by 931
Drug and Family Therapy in the Aftercare of Acute Schizophrenics
Goldstein, M. J. (1978) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770340019001 · Cited by 521
Interventions for boys with conduct problems: Multiple settings, treatments, and criteria.
Patterson, G. R. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036731 · Cited by 432
Yeaton, W. H., & SECHREST, L. B. (1981) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.49.2.156 · Cited by 407
On the relation of clinical research to clinical practice: Current issues, new directions.
Barlow, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.49.2.147 · Cited by 215
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Hayes, 1981, Time series methodology and empirical clinical practice, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 193, 10.1037/0022-006X.49.2.193 · DOI
- Hugdahl, 1981, On the difference between statistical and clinical significance, Behavioral Assessment, 3, 289
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,006 of 1,006
Tromp, N., van Dijk, R., Saunders, R., & Fonagy, P. (2021) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi_2021_35_517 · Cited by 3
Black, S. R., Blampied, N., Arnold, L. E., & Fristad, M. (2018) · Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/cpsp.12272 · Cited by 3
WISC-IV : valeurs seuils pour des changements significatifs des scores de différence test–retest
Lecerf, T., Kieng, S., & Geistlich, S. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.prps.2016.07.003 · Cited by 3
Helbig, F., Pixa, A., Bühringer, G., & Hoyer, J. (2017) · Verhaltenstherapie (Basel) · doi:10.1159/000455660 · Cited by 3
Hwang, A. D., & Spangler, D. L. (2016) · Eating Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.12.003 · Cited by 3
The treatment of magical ideation in two individuals with obsessive compulsive disorder
Einstein, D. A., Menzies, R., Clare, T. S., Drobny, J., & Helgadottir, F. (2010) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1017/s1754470x10000140 · Cited by 3
“Despite lower scores on the MOCI at follow up, the scores were deemed unchanged according to the twofold criteria of Jacobson et al. (1984).”
MethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Jacobson, Neil S.
- ORCID
- Jacobson, Neil S.
- Venue
- Behavior Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1984-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 336-352
- ISSN
- 0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086791094
- Cited by
- 1,294
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 48
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- psychotherapy outcome research, clinical significance, statistical significance, treatment response classification, statistical reliability, treatment outcome assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
