Cited by 442Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

Sham TMS: intracerebral measurement of the induced electrical field and the induction of motor-evoked potentials

Lisanby, Sarah H, Gutman, David, Luber, Bruce, Schroeder, Charles, Sackeim, Harold A·2001·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Testing the therapeutic potential of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in controlled trials requires a valid sham condition. Sham TMS is typically administered by tilting the coil 45--90 degrees off the scalp, with one or two wings of the coil touching the scalp. Lack of cortical effects has not been verified. We compared sham manipulations in their thresholds for eliciting motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in human volunteers and in intracerebral measurements of voltage induced in the prefrontal cortex of a rhesus monkey. Three types of sham (one-wing 45 degrees and 90 degrees and two-wing 90 degrees tilt) induced much lower voltage in the brain than active TMS (67--73% reductions). However, the two-wing 45 degrees sham induced values just 24% below active TMS. This sham was about half as potent in inducing MEPs over the motor cortex as active TMS. Some sham TMS conditions produce substantial cortical stimulation, making it critical to carefully select the sham manipulation for clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01110-0

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lisanby, S. H., Gutman, D., Luber, B., Schroeder, C., & Sackeim, H. A.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
460-463
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967288162
Cited by
442
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH01577)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
motor evoked potentials, prefrontal cortex, rhesus monkeys, motor cortex stimulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Electric Stimulation, Female, Humans, Male, Motor Cortex, Prefrontal Cortex, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Electromagnetic Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review