Cited by 55Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

Acute high-frequency rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and attentional control in healthy young men

Hwang, Ji Hee, Kim, Sang Hee, Park, Chang Soo, Bang, Seong Ae, Kim, Sang Eun·2010·Brain Research

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex induces neuromodulation in prefrontal and striatal regions. We hypothesized that high-frequency rTMS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex would influence attentional control, which has been associated with neural activity in the same region. Seventeen healthy young men volunteered to participate in a sham-controlled rTMS study. Participants received both rTMS and sham stimulation on separate days and the Conners' continuous performance test was used to assess response inhibition and attentional vigilance. Results indicated that participants showed fewer commission errors during trials after rTMS as compared with sham stimulation, at longer interstimulus intervals (ISIs), which suggests that high-frequency rTMS may have the potential to improve response inhibition. This finding contributes to the understanding of the relationship between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and attentional control and suggests possible therapeutic applications for high-frequency rTMS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.013

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TMS and tDCS have been evidenced to improve both selective attention via targeting the DLPFC in healthy controls and sustained attention in depressed adults.

    “TMS and tDCS have been evidenced to improve both selective attention via targeting the DLPFC in healthy controls131 and sustained attention in depressed adults132.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [131]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hwang, J. H., Kim, S. H., Park, C. S., Bang, S. A., & Kim, S. E.
Affiliations
Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Kim, Sang Hee
  • Kim, Sang Eun
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
1329
Pages
152-158
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968450430
Cited by
55
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (20090093889, M2008-03915)
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (02-2007-002)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, attentional control, response inhibition, attentional vigilance, commission errors, interstimulus interval, neuromodulation, Conners' Continuous Performance Test
MeSH terms
Attention, Brain Mapping, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Functional Laterality, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Time Factors, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review