Cited by 143Schizophrenia research and treatmentVisual perception and processing mechanismsHallucinations in medical conditions

Transient versus sustained visual channels in the visual backward masking deficits of schizophrenia patients

Cadenhead, Kristin S., Serper, Yulya, Braff, David L.·1998·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Schizophrenia patients have information-processing deficits that can be quantified using visual backward masking. The visual information processing system is divided functionally and structurally into transient and sustained visual channels. When visual stimuli are presented to a subject, the transient pathway detects the presence and location of the stimulus while the sustained pathway is involved in fine discrimination and identification of the stimulus. While independent subcortically, the transient and sustained visual channels converge cortically into the dorsal and ventral processing streams that assess spatial relationships and object recognition respectively.Methods To better understand the underlying mechanisms of the visual backward masking deficits, 16 schizophrenia patients and 17 comparison subjects were tested on two different visual backward masking paradigms that required either locating or identifying a target letter.Results Schizophrenia patients had visual backward masking deficits in a task that involved locating a target letter while there were no deficits in the task that involved identification of a target letter.Conclusions The visual backward masking deficits of schizophrenia patients suggest impairment in the processing of spatial information. These deficits are discussed in the context of our current knowledge of visual information processing and the neuropathophysiology of schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(97)00316-8

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with schizophrenia show preferential M-pathway dysfunction, although deficits have also been observed in parvocellular processing.

    “Patients with schizophrenia show preferential M-pathway dysfunction (21,22,28,35–38), although deficits have also been observed in parvocellular processing (19,20).”

    From Visual perception and its impairment in schizophrenia (2008) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cadenhead, K. S., Serper, Y., & Braff, D. L.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-01
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
132-138
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968242769
Cited by
143
References
32
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K37MH42228, K20MH001124, K20MH01124)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
Keywords
schizophrenia, visual backward masking, visual processing, spatial data processing, dorsal stream, ventral stream, object recognition, target localization, target identification
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Photic Stimulation, Schizophrenic Psychology, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review